katero
Jun 30, 2026

Why can’t college sports be fixed? Look at Michigan’s response to Dusty May leaving

Commentary

Why can’t college sports be fixed? Look at Michigan’s response to Dusty May leaving

Former Michigan basketball coach Dusty May crosses his arms and wears a backward hat while looking up with people standing behind him.

Michigan lost men’s basketball coach Dusty May to the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks after winning the national title. Michael Reaves / Getty Images

By Austin MeekJune 30, 2026 6:05 am EDT Updated

A two-minute clip from a recent meeting of Michigan’s board of regents was a Rosetta Stone for understanding why college sports leaders can’t seem to fix the problems that everyone sees so clearly.

Domenico Grasso, Michigan’s president, addressed the departure of men’s basketball coach Dusty May, whose decision to coach the Dallas Mavericks blindsided a lot of people in Ann Arbor. At Michigan and elsewhere, losing one of college basketball’s brightest minds was viewed as another canary in the increasingly toxic coal mine of college sports.

“Coach May told me that among his reasons for leaving were uncertainties and pressures involving the transfer portal and NIL support for student-athletes,” Grasso said. “He and I agreed that the future of college sports is headed in the wrong direction.”

In the next breath, Grasso voiced Michigan’s objections to the Protect College Sports Act, a bill that is intended to address those very problems. While acknowledging that college sports are in “dire need of clarity and equitable reform,” Grasso echoed the stance of the Big Ten and the SEC, which do not support the legislation.

“We want what’s best for the Big Ten and for Michigan,” Grasso said. “We are not going to sacrifice the competitive advantage that we have built for more than a century.”

Dusty May leaving for pros is familiar for Michigan fansAustin Meek

By now, it should be obvious that “equitable reform” and “competitive advantage” don’t fit neatly in the same box. In trying to have it both ways, leaders in college sports sound a lot like St. Augustine: God, grant me chastity, but just not yet.

In college sports, the optimal amount of money to spend on a roster is whatever your school and its donors can afford. Any school that pays less lacks the want-to and resources to fully support student-athletes; any school that pays more is contributing to out-of-control spending. Schools with competitive advantages want to preserve those advantages, while the schools at a disadvantage want to rein in the big spenders.

None of this is meant as an endorsement of the Protect College Sports Act, a bipartisan bill that recently advanced out of the Senate Commerce Committee. The Big Ten and SEC aren’t wrong to feel targeted by provisions that could curb future conference realignment and open the door for the pooling of media rights. And any attempt to cap what college athletes can be paid, absent a collective bargaining agreement, is fair game for criticism.

The point is that everyone’s definition of “equitable reform” is a solution that enshrines all of the privileges schools believe they are entitled to. If Michigan is doing what’s best for Michigan, Texas Tech is doing what’s best for Texas Tech and LSU is doing what’s best for LSU, no one is actually fixing anything.

Other posts