What to watch for in Colorado tonight: From the Politics Desk
Kornacki: Colorado incumbent Rep. DeGette in ‘serious jeopardy’ as she faces far-left challenger08:33June 30, 2026, 5:45 PM EDTBy The Politics DeskWelcome to From the Politics Desk, a daily newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team’s latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail.
In today’s edition, Steve Kornacki previews the Colorado primaries, the next test for establishment Democrats. Plus, we wrap up all the fallout from the last day of the Supreme Court’s term.
Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.
— Adam Wollner
What to watch for in Colorado tonight
Analysis by Steve Kornacki
Another Tuesday, another set of endangered incumbents.
The setting this week is Colorado, where both U.S. senators and a long-tenured House member confront Democratic primary threats.
Arguably the most vulnerable is Rep. Diana DeGette, who has represented the Denver-based 1st District since 1997. She is being opposed by Melot Kiros, who has the backing of the Democratic Socialists of America and has made criticism of Israel central to her campaign. Insurgencies like hers have succeeded in several other urban districts this year, most notably in New York City just last week. Demographically, the 1st District, with a population heavy with young, educated progressives, would seem to be fertile ground for Kiros.
Sen. Michael Bennet is also clearly in trouble as he bids to become governor. His opponent, state Attorney General Phil Weiser, has a conventional political background but has leaned into the apparent leftward energy in the party.
The real question is how much peril Bennet’s Senate colleague, John Hickenlooper, faces. Hickenlooper, who is in his first term, is being challenged by Julie Gonzales, a state senator from Denver, who is running on a left-wing platform and has long-standing ties to the DSA. The same voters who are powering Kiros could boost Gonzales in Denver, where about 20% of all votes statewide will be cast. The progressive mecca of Boulder, where another 10% of the vote will come from, could also be a rich source for Gonzales.
But whether there’s a broader appetite for her candidacy is unclear. A poll conducted last month by a progressive firm for an unknown client found Hickenlooper with a single-digit lead over Gonzales. There are no other public surveys to compare that result to — whether it’s a portent or a red herring is anyone’s guess.
Certainly, there is a pronounced progressive strain among Colorado Democrats. In 2020, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., easily won the presidential primary. And the combined vote share for Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., was more than 55%. A few months after that, Hickenlooper won the Democratic Senate primary over a well-known progressive opponent 59-41%, carrying all but one county.
The vast majority of votes are cast by mail in Colorado, with counties typically tallying and reporting out giant initial batches shortly after polls close. In 2024, half of the vote was released within the first hour and 75% by midnight. But after that, results slowed to a dayslong trickle as counties methodically worked to process mail ballots.
Further complicating expectations for tonight is that younger, progressive voters have demonstrated across multiple states this year a tendency to return ballots at the last minute. Often, those votes aren’t tabulated until late in the night or in the days following an election. So if any of today’s races are close, we may be waiting on a winner for a while.
🎥 Tune in to the Kornacki Cam at 8:45 p.m. ET to watch Steve break down the results. At the end of the night, he will also answer questions from NBC News subscribers. Submit your questions here.
After his Supreme Court loss, Trump calls on Congress to pass a law banning birthright citizenship
By Allan Smith
President Donald Trump brushed off a major loss at the Supreme Court, whose 6-3 decision struck down one of his signature initiatives: an effort to limit birthright citizenship.
Trump and some of his congressional allies quickly said they weren’t fully giving up the fight, arguing that one path was to pass a law including the same provisions as his defeated order. But with the current makeup of Congress, that legislation would be dead on arrival.
“The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support!”
The case was near and dear to Trump. In April, he attended a Supreme Court hearing on the case, becoming the first sitting president to ever go to oral arguments.
Trump’s executive order, which lower courts quickly put on hold after he signed it the day he returned to office, would have limited birthright citizenship to those with at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident — meaning children born in the U.S. to temporary visitors, those on student visas or work permits, or undocumented immigrants wouldn’t be citizens at birth.
Five of the six justices who found the order unlawful said it ran afoul of the 14th Amendment, which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” The sixth justice, Brett Kavanaugh, who was nominated by Trump, said the order violated the law but not the Constitution.
With a majority ruling that the executive order ran afoul of the 14th Amendment, a constitutional amendment would most likely be necessary to achieve Trump’s goal.
“Recall for a constitutional amendment to be adopted: A proposed amendment must be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who previously was his state’s attorney general and a member of the Texas Supreme Court, posted on X.
📊 Related: New data from the NBC News poll finds that a slim majority (54%) of U.S. adults said being born in the U.S. is important to being “truly American,” while 45% say it isn’t important. Overall, respondents ranked several other traits as far more important to American identity.
⚖️ More from the Supreme Court:
The Supreme Court upheld state laws that ban transgender athletes from participating in girls’ and women’s sports.
The court also struck down longtime campaign finance rules challenged by Vice President JD Vance that limit how much a national political party committee can spend in coordination with individual candidates. (More on that below.)
And justices agreed to decide whether states and local governments can ban semiautomatic rifles like the AR-15.
For subscribers: What the Supreme Court’s campaign finance ruling means for the 2026 election
By Ben Kamisar
Today’s Supreme Court ruling changing certain federal campaign finance limits could make a big difference in the battle for control of Congress this fall, giving Republican candidates who have been getting outraised by opponents direct access to more party cash.
🗞️ Today's other top stories
- ➡️ Back in action: Rep. Tom Kean, R-N.J., made his return to the Capitol, saying he was treated for depression during a nearly four-month disappearance from the public eye. Read more →
- 🗳️ What’s in a name: The Alaska Supreme Court ruled that a candidate with the same name as GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan can appear on the August primary ballot, the Anchorage Daily News reports. Read more →
- 🌎 As MAHA world turns: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has advocated for deregulating a number of peptides, but scientists at the Food and Drug Administration say there’s insufficient evidence to recommend their use. Read more →
That’s all From the Politics Desk for now. Today’s newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Annelise Hanson.
If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at [email protected]
And if you’re a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here.
Add NBC News to GoogleThe Politics Desk
Supreme Court nods to reality in three huge final rulings
Supremes nod to reality in three huge rulings- US News
- World News
- Page Six
- Sports
- Post Sports+
- Sports Betting
- Business
- Opinion
- Entertainment
- Shopping
- Lifestyle
- Health
- Real Estate
- Alexa
- Media
- Tech
- Science
- Astrology
- Video
- Photos
- Pod Force One
- NY POSTcast
Switch between CA and NY editions here.
EditionRecommended
Skip to main content Opinion editorialSupreme Court nods to reality in three huge final rulings
By Post Editorial Board Published June 30, 2026, 6:56 p.m. ET
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Add The New York Post on GoogleThe Supremes played it straight in its final decisions of the season Tuesday, delivering two knockout rulings — on trans sports and campaign finance — and one on birthright citizenship that reflects a fair reading of the law, even if it disappoints President Donald Trump and immigration hardliners.
Letting states ban trans girls — that is, biological boys — from girls’ sports in publicly funded schools and colleges is a victory for states’ rights and common sense.
Even more important, such bans restore fair competition for biologically female athletes in their sports and relieve the concerns of millions of parents who don’t want boys or men watching their daughters undress and shower in locker rooms, regardless of how they “identify.”
Giving girls and young women equal access to their own sports under Title IX was a hard-fought achievement for women’s rights that was pointedly attacked by the trans lobby, which made a twisted appeal for “fairness.”
Indeed, allowing physically superior biological men to compete on the same playing fields and stand on the same award podiums as young women is the precise opposite of fair play.
The court also lifted restrictions on campaign spending by political parties on their candidates, so-called “coordinated spending.”
More From Post Editorial Board
Supreme Court ruling gives Trump a chance to finally slay the Deep State monster
Fast Takes: GOP still wins on immigration, the meaning of NY diploma and other commentary
Hunter Biden-style sleaze is just as slimy when the Trump boys do it
True, money isn’t exactly speech, but it’s been well-established — for example, in the Citizens United case — that restricting financing that can pay for pamphlets, commercials, films, etc. — amounts to a restriction of the First Amendment.
Letting political parties work with their candidates isn’t a stretch, nor is it carving out some exotic new vehicle for corruption.
Finally, in a close 5-4 decision, the court ruled against Trump’s executive order ending “birthright citizenship.”
Get opinions and commentary from our columnists
Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter!
Thanks for signing up!
Illegal immigrants, say restrictionists, are quick to have babies here who get automatic citizenship simply by being born on US soil in order to “anchor” their presence in the country.
Birthright citizenship, they say, draws them in, amounting to a loophole that needs to be close.
Yet Chief Justice John Roberts noted that the 14th Amendment doesn’t say anything about the status of the parents of a baby born here, and that the country would need to amend the Constitution to make such a profound change to the definition of American citizenship.
This is a plain reading of the law, and shows deference to long-established judicial rulings.
Restrictionists should nonetheless take heart: Just last week, the court ruled that the president can deny entry to bogus asylum-seekers at the border, which will go a long way to screening out those seeking to have anchor babies here.
Tuesday’s decisions add up to a solid affirmation of common sense, a recognition of shared values and plain, straight-forward reading of the law. Bravo!
Filed under Read Next Soccer fans sent a message to Washington on Iran — deal ...Columnists
-
Nicole Gelinas
Mamdani is socializing housing in NYC, costing taxpayers billions
-
Daniel McCarthy
Bill Maher got the award, but Trump’s free-speech impact is the real prize
-
Cindy Adams
Summer is the time to see the world — and hunt for deals
See All Columnists
Covers
Today's Cover
Front Cover Back Cover
Flip for back cover
Browse Covers
Trending Now on NYPost.com
-
This story has been shared 95,875 times.
95,875
Mystery of explosive diarrhea parasite outbreak in the US — as experts try to figure out what’s causing it
-
This story has been shared 66,385 times.
66,385
Cops who busted smiling sisters Cookie and Kitty offer hint at motive for Texas mom’s murder
-
This story has been shared 52,422 times.
52,422
Chilling photo shows bloodied Texas mom after allegedly being stabbed by twisted teen Cookie
More Stories
Page Six
‘The Devil Wears Prada 2’ is now streaming — Here’s how to watch at home
Decider
Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Agent Kim Reactivated’ On Netflix, Where A Mild-Mannered Office Worker Dregs Up His Black Ops Past When His Daughter Goes Missing
NYPost
Mystery of explosive diarrhea parasite outbreak in the US — as experts try to figure out what’s causing it
© 2026 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use Subscription Terms Privacy Notice SitemapYour California Privacy Rights