Sky call handler sacked after hanging up on customers
We may all feel like putting the phone down on colleagues or annoying callers from time to time.
But a senior sales caller at Sky was sacked for doing just that.
Lorraine Hunter, whose job it was to listen to customer complaints, repeatedly told callers to wait for 'just a second' and then hung up on them, a tribunal heard.
Ms Hunter, who worked for Sky for more than 30 years, then tried to blame technology troubles but did not realise the calls were being recorded.
She claimed she had been unfairly dismissed at an employment tribunal but lost after it emerged 'hanging up on a customer' was listed as potential gross misconduct in the company's rulebook.
Lorraine Hunter only took around five calls a day, it was heard. Pictured, stock image of woman working a call centre.
Ms Hunter then took her claim of unfair dismissal to an employment tribunal in Edinburgh but Employment Judge Michelle Sutherland said Sky was entirely reasonable to dismiss her
Ms Hunter had been employed as a Customer Priority Specialist at Sky Subscriber Services Limited since 1995.
She would deal with high-profile or high-value customers, resolving issues and addressing changes to their contracts.
Ms Hunter only took around five calls a day, it was heard.
Sky's Customer Contact Guiding Principles, state 'providing the best customer service in the country is at the heart of everything we do'.
It goes on to say 'if you are talking to a customer and the call is disconnected for any reason, as long as you've got a contact number to return the call, you should always call the customer back as soon as possible, apologise for the disconnect and carry on with the inquiry'.
Examples of behaviour that may constitute gross misconduct include: 'hanging up on a customer and not calling the customer back.'
However in November 2024 an investigation was launched into Ms Hunter after an incident led managers to believe she might be doing just that.
Agents' phone calls were recorded and stored so they could be listened to in full for the investigation.
Seven phone calls were identified in the records which appeared to be prematurely disconnected by Ms Hunter.
Disconnecting a call requires a 'two-step physical action' and is unlikely to be done accidentally.
The first of these calls, from July 25 2024, lasted just 13 seconds before she hung up, and while Ms Hunter could not be heard on the recording, the background noise from the office could.
She claimed the reason she did not immediately call back was that she must have dialled the wrong number - but she ended up successfully calling back a whole two hours later.
The second call was internal - from another agent - to transfer a high priority customer to Ms Hunter.
When the other agent asked Ms Hunter to 'wait a moment' she said 'okay, thank you' - before hanging up.
The third call was from a customer explaining their signal from Sky was intermittent.
Ms Hunter claimed she could not hear the customer but hung up just two seconds after saying 'hello'.
The fourth call did register that there were technical issues before Ms Hunter hung up, but she did not call the customer back once these had been resolved, as was proper. A fifth call involved an 'irate' customer who wanted to attempt to cancel his contract with Sky.
Ms Hunter asked him to 'bear with me a second' before placing him on mute for a minute - and then disconnecting the call entirely.
She claimed she had not done so and that the only reason she had not called back was that she did not have his number. The customer called back to complain that he had been hung up on.
The sixth call identified was from September 2024, when Ms Hunter called a customer to put through their order.
She told them that it was 'new for her' and asked them to 'give me a second, just a second', but she then hung up just six minutes into the call, though she did call this customer back.
She ended the seventh call three minutes before her shift was due to end and sent a WhatsApp to colleagues stating 'call dropped if he calls back in please apologise'.
Ms Hunter was subsequently invited to a conduct meeting on May 28 2025 where these calls were played for her.
On June 2 she was summarily dismissed, being told: 'you have breached our policies by disconnecting customers and failing to call customers back which represents a significant risk moving forward.'
She appealed, claiming she had not hung up and that there must have been technical issues, but she was reminded that information about technical issues are stored in the calls' records and the decision was upheld.
Ms Hunter then took her claim of unfair dismissal to an employment tribunal in Edinburgh but Employment Judge Michelle Sutherland said it was entirely reasonable to dismiss her.
The judge concluded: '[Sky] had a reasonable belief that [Ms Hunter] had deliberately and prematurely disconnected customer calls (i.e. hung up on customers).
'[Sky] had carried out a reasonable investigation and formed that belief on reasonable grounds.
'[Sky] acted reasonably in all the circumstances in treating that as a sufficient reason to dismiss [Ms Hunter] notwithstanding her long service without prior warning.
'[Ms Hunter's] dismissal was fair and her complaint of unfair dismissal is accordingly dismissed.'
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'
Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'