katero
Jun 30, 2026

‘Serious mistake’: U.S. Supreme Court rules against Trump on birthright citizenship, Thomas and Alito voice profound dissent * WorldNetDaily * by Joe Kovacs

‘Serious mistake’: U.S. Supreme Court rules against Trump on birthright citizenship, Thomas and Alito voice profound dissent

By Joe Kovacs

June 30, 2026

(Pexels)

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled children born in the United States, including those whose parents are in the country unlawfully or only temporarily, are indeed American citizens according to the the Fourteenth Amendment, striking down President Donald Trump’s executive order.

🚨 JUST IN: Justice Clarence Thomas SLAMS the Supreme Court decision strike down President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order

Thomas writes that the 14th Amendment “was enacted in the wake of the Civil War with the ONE pervading purpose of securing equal citizenship… https://t.co/KHTpEHAGPX pic.twitter.com/evSUjB8pqO

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 30, 2026

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the 6-3 majority, indicated children born to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily in the United States satisfy the amendment’s citizenship clause.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND's Email News Alerts!

“Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights − to freely participate in our political community,” Roberts wrote. “The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land.’ We keep that promise today.”

“Those children are thus subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. They satisfy both elements of the Citizenship Clause: they are ‘born … in the United States’ and ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ Under the Constitution, they are citizens at birth.”

Roberts was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Jackson. Justice Brett Kavanaugh agrees in part in the judgment and dissents elsewhere. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissent.

In his dissent, Thomas writes the Fourteenth Amendment “was enacted in the wake of the Civil War with the one pervading purpose of securing equal citizenship for the freed slaves.”

🚨 The Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship to children born in the United States, including those whose parents are in the country unlawfully or only temporarily, striking down President Trump’s executive order. pic.twitter.com/iDns5rmqJF

— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) June 30, 2026

Thomas accused the majority of “repurposing” the Fourteenth Amendment “to protect its own set of preferred rights that the Reconstruction Congress never contemplated and that cannot find support in its text.”

“Today, the Court does so again by recognizing a constitutional right to citizenship for the children of all foreign birth tourists and illegal aliens.”

“I am not sure that today’s opinion will stand the test of time. The Citizenship Clause ‘added greatly to the dignity and glory of American citizenship.’ Today’s opinion devalues that citizenship.”

“I respectfully dissent.”

Other posts