Brother-in-law handed £490,000 court bill after losing family dispute
The brother of a late property tycoon who lost a bitter inheritance battle with his yoga teacher widow has been handed a £490,000 court bill.
Gabriela Teixeira, 51, and her brother-in-law Amir Moaven were locked in a High Court dispute over Abbas Moaven's £5million fortune.
Ms Teixeira, a birth doula and yoga teacher, had been expecting to inherit millions when her wealthy investor husband of ten years died in 2012, aged 45.
The mother-of-two was shocked to discover that he had signed legal documents weeks before his death to declare four properties - at the time worth over £3million - were actually shared with his mother and Amir.
But 14 years after he died, Ms Teixeira and her two children - Elis and Aryan - have won a court battle after they successfully argued that their entire value should be included in her husband's estate.
Her victory has boosted her inheritance to as much as £5m while Amir has been found liable to pay the £490,000 legal costs of the case.
High Court judge, Deputy Master Timothy Bowles, found that the documents Abbas signed declaring the properties were not entirely his were a 'sham,' designed to prevent his widow from accessing most of his wealth after he died and that the story behind them being drawn up was a 'fiction'.
The judge also found that Abbas' accountant Behzad Faiz and conveyancing solicitor Marios Robert Pittalis are also jointly responsible alongside Amir to pay £473,000 of the bill, having been 'complicit' in the creation of the 'sham' documents.
Amir also has to pay an extra £17,000.
Abbas, and his brother, Amir, moved to the UK from Iran in 1982 to live with their father and later began a west London clothing shop called Homeboy together.
Pictured: Gabriela Teixeira, a birth doula and yoga teacher, who was won a court battle over her late husband's £5million fortune
Pictured: Amir Moaven, Ms Teixeira's brother-in-law who has been has been found liable to pay the £490,000 legal costs of the case
They then moved into the then burgeoning mobile phone market in the mid-1990s and later restaurants, while also buying up a series of properties around the capital.
Ms Teixeira and Abbas met at his then restaurant, The Gate, close to Notting Hill Gate Station, and began dating, eventually marrying.
Abbas was diagnosed with cancer in 2009 and died in May 2012, with his last will leaving his estate in third shares to his widow and two children.
But the court heard the estate was 'substantially diminished' because, only weeks before he died and while in hospital in April 2012, Abbas had signed fake trust documents, declaring that four properties in his name were actually owned in one-third shares by himself, his brother Amir and their mother, Nazemi Tehran, who has since died.
Ms Teixeira's barrister, Alexander Learmonth KC, argued that the documents were 'obviously shams,' designed by Abbas to prevent his wife or creditors from making a claim to most of his assets after his death.
He pointed to an attendance note from a meeting between Abbas' solicitor Mr Pittalis and Amir, when Abbas was 'seriously unwell' at home and his brother was seeking to 'regularise their affairs.'
The lawyers' note stated: 'His concern was what would happen if Abbas passed away and his wife disappeared with the two children to Brazil. How could they prevent this, and how could they prevent her from having access to the funds from the property assets?'
A subsequent note following another meeting added: 'Amir confirmed his main intention was to secure Abbas' children's welfare because he was certain that any assets passed over to Abbas' wife would be dissipated.'
Mr Learmonth told the judge that Ms Teixeira was anxious to restore the properties to the estate and get her inheritance, adding: 'She is unable to sustain the lifestyle she enjoyed during Abbas' lifetime, while he was still well, on her income working as a doula.
'It is deeply unsatisfactory that 14 years later, Gabriela and her two children - now grown from infancy to adulthood - have still not been able to obtain a proper account of Abbas' estate, let alone to receive their inheritance.'
Allowing the claim in May, the judge dismissed arguments by Amir, now 56, that the four properties - which include Ms Teixeira's former homes in Queen's Gate, Holland Park and Brasenose House, Kensington, as well as rental property in Maida Hill - were only ever put into Abbas' name for 'cultural reasons' because he was the elder brother.
'Contrary to the false narrative set out in the recitals to declarations of trust, the properties are not and never have been held on the informal trusts alleged in those recitals and in the declarations of trust,' he said.
'The extrinsic evidence fully supports the view that Abbas has always been the legal and beneficial owner of the properties.'
Going on this week to order Amir, Mr Pittalis and Mr Faiz to foot the bill for the court fight, the judge said the declarations of trust were 'no more than deceitful forms of words, or "pieces of paper", designed to convey to those to whom they were deployed that Abbas' estate was very much smaller than it truly was.
Mr Pittalis and Mr Faiz were also 'equally as involved' as each other in creating the documents.
The judge added that Amir had not 'duped' Mr Pittalis and instead he was 'complicit' in the creation and execution of the sham documents.
'I can see no reason at all as to why Mr Pittalis should not be liable in costs for his role in the conduct that, in complicity with Amir and Mr Faiz, has given rise to this trial,' he continued.
He went on to order that the costs be assessed on the punishing 'indemnity basis' due to the conduct of the three men in the litigation.
'In this case, the conduct of Amir, Mr Pittalis and Mr Faiz, which, in concert with Abbas, has given rise to this litigation, has been manifestly and radically outside the norm,' he said.
'They chose to deliberately put in place sham documents with the intention, not merely of misleading those to whom they were deployed, but, ultimately, with the intention of misleading the court.
'The conduct of Amir, Mr Pittalis and Mr Faiz, in respect of the declarations of trust was, from the very outset, directed towards the creation of sham documents which could be sustained in court and which might, or would, deceive the court.
'That conduct was, in consequence, central to and causative of the current trial and it is, for that reason and in consequence of their role in the creation of sham documents for those purposes that they should now, the dishonest nature of the documents having been exploded, be liable, on the indemnity basis, for the costs that have had to be incurred in exposing the deceitful nature of the declarations of trust.'
The full costs bills will be assessed at a later date, but the judge ordered the men to jointly pay £154,800 up front towards Ms Teixeira and the kids' costs and £318,800 towards costs run up by the administrators of Abbas' estate. Another £17,000 is Amir's sole responsibility to pay.
Partly due to complex tax and debt issues, the exact size of Abbas' estate has not yet been calculated, with lawyers estimating that it could be as much as £5m with the four properties included.
Police officer raped two women and abused a third
Police officer raped two women and abused a third
He 'carried out deliberate and repeated acts of abuse against women'.
Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied
A former police officer has been sentenced to 10 years in prison after being found guilty of violent and non-recent sexual offences against women. Cameron Ross, 39, was sentenced on Thursday, 2 July, for the offences that took place in Stornoway on the Isle of Lewis in 2012 and 2014 and Inverness between 2019 and 2022.
He had denied charges, but had been found guilty at the High Court in Edinburgh on Monday, May 25, where he was also sentenced. During the trial, the court heard how Ross raped the first woman after they met at a party on Lewis between August and October 2012. A second woman told the court of how Ross sat on her and restrained her before raping her in June 2014. He went on to subject a third woman to a course of abusive behaviour between October 2019 and June 2022 in Inverness, the court heard. Alongside being found guilty of rape and domestic abuse, the former policeman was also found guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice and threatening or abusive behaviour, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service said.
Get the day's biggest headlines in UK and World news and more Invalid emailWe use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy
- Huge police update as boy, 16, fighting for life - shot during England's World Cup match
- Henry Nowak murderer ‘terrified’ and refuses prison wing over Huntley killing fears
Ross, who resigned from Police Scotland in June 2026, has been placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely.
Faye Cook, Procurator Fiscal for High Court Sexual Offences at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), said: “Cameron Ross carried out deliberate and repeated acts of abuse against women over the course of a decade. This was sustained offending, which caused significant harm. As a police officer, he was in a position of trust. Instead of upholding the law, he chose to break it in a serious and persistent way. I would urge anyone affected by similar offending to come forward and report it. The Crown is committed to prosecuting those responsible for sexual and domestic abuse, regardless of who they are.”
Chief Superintendent Helen Harrison, Head of Professional Standards, said: "Ross was a serving officer at the time of these offences and when the report was received in June 2022, we immediately suspended him. He has since resigned from the service. If he had remained, we would have progressed gross misconduct proceedings and he would have been dismissed as his actions and behaviour will not be tolerated in Police Scotland.
"I want to thank those who came forward and recognise how difficult that can be when the perpetrator is a police officer.
"Police Scotland continues to work with survivors’ groups to improve our response to violence against women and girls to embed an approach which places survivors at the heart of our investigation with a trauma-informed approach and we remain committed to further improvement.
"Equally, over a period of years, and advanced by Lady Elish Angiolini's review in 2020, there has been a Scotland wide focus on police ethics, conduct and scrutiny."
Get top stories from The Express sent straight to your phone Join us on WhatsAppOur community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy
The superintendent also said police "continue to fully engage with those developments to strengthen our safeguarding of policing's integrity and we're working to embed new legislation to continue that improvement".
"We fully accept the onus is on policing to build confidence with members of the public, victims and witnesses to ensure they can report wrongdoing by police officers and staff, and can be confident that robust action will be taken.
“Police Scotland is committed to reviewing its processes, policies, and procedures, which continue to evolve and are shaped by feedback. The ability to handle police misconduct matters in a more robust, timely and transparent way will now also be greatly strengthened by the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Act 2025,” she said.