House Skipping Town Early As SAVE America Act Saga Continues To Rock Capitol Hill

House Skipping Town Early As SAVE America Act Saga Continues To Rock Capitol Hill

(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

The House will enter an early recess Tuesday after several Republicans voted down a procedural rules vote, Speaker Mike Johnson’s office confirmed to the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The House voted against a procedural vote Tuesday that would allow debate on attaching the Safeguard America Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The lower chamber is scheduled to enter the July 4 recess and not return until July 13.

Republican Reps. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, Chip Roy of Texas, Victoria Spartz of Indiana, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Eric Burlison of Missouri, Randy Fine of Florida, Eli Crane of Arizona, Max Miller of Ohio, Andy Harris of Maryland, Mike Turner of Ohio, Keith Self of Texas and Lauren Boebert of Colorado voted against the rule. (RELATED: Here Are All The Times Congressional Lawmakers Gave Themselves A Vacation In Past Year)

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise voted “no” as a procedural move to offer a motion to reconsider the vote. Scalise’s procedural vote could allow the vote to be taken up again, which usually happens after more negotiations or adjustments.

Luna introduced an amendment to attach the SAVE America to the NDAA, threatening to shut down all rules votes if the SAVE Act was not attached. Johnson planned to attach the SAVE America Act through a special process called “MIRVing,” where lawmakers attach unrelated bills into a single massive package.

Luna argued the SAVE America Act language should be directly added to the NDAA’s text so it would be harder for the Senate to remove it. The Republican holdouts agreed with Luna and rejected the “MIRVing” procedure.

Johnson said during a press gaggle that these Republicans voted against the SAVE America Act by rejecting the rules vote.

“I am very sad to tell you, because in the rule we would have had the merge, which means we merge together, literally, the SAVE America Act that we passed unanimously back in February, with the National Defense Authorization Act. Those two bills would have become one and been transmitted to the Senate in that way,” Johnson said.

🚨🚨 @SpeakerJohnson on GOP colleagues voting down rules vote on attaching SAVE America Act to NDAA:

“We had a handful of Republicans who voted against its advancement. They also, as you know, as a consequence, voted against the SAVE America Act.”

“I am very sad to tell you,…

— Nicole Silverio (@NicoleMSilverio) June 30, 2026

Johnson met with President Donald Trump to diffuse the situation among the holdouts Thursday. Trump called on Republicans to unite and not vote against any rules in a Thursday Truth Social post.

The Senate entered recess early Thursday after Senate Republicans attended a heated lunch with Trump, who pressured them to pass the SAVE America Act and railed against the passage of a concurrent war powers resolution. Any senator could have objected or blocked the adjournment, though no one did.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Labour blasted for 'prioritising' benefits over 'clear plan' on defence

Labour blasted for 'prioritising' benefits over 'clear plan' on defence

Sir Keir Starmer has been blasted by critics after his long-awaited defence investment plan failed to stump up the cash the military needs.

Add us as preferred source

Labour's unwillingness to cut welfare to fund defence has been blasted as a poison pill for the next decade of funding for the armed forces.

The accusation came last night after the release of Sir Keir Starmer's long-awaited funding package to re-arm and future-proof the military.

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

But defence insiders warned that the cash was still below 2.68%, prompting two of his own defence ministers to quit in protest earlier this month.

It also creates an almighty headache for potential incoming Prime Minister Andy Burnham, after a nearly £5billion black hole was exposed in the scheme - meaning he'd have to cut budgets or slam up taxes.

Speaking to the Express, the Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge agreed that Mr Burnham was the wrong Prime Minister for an uncertain world.

He warned that Mr Burnham had made a huge speech about the rewiring of the country, but Mr Cartlidge asked: "What about the rewiring of defence?"

"Where is the defence of the realm, which is the number one responsibility of any government? Where was that in his speech?" he blasted.

In a warning shot to the PM-to-be, he added: "If the government doesn't have a plan to cut welfare and fund defence [...] they are not going to be successful."

Even the former Defence Secretary John Healey said: “More needs to be done in the months ahead”.

But he warned that the country needed to "develop a clear, credible funding plan" that would mean the UK could hit its NATO spending commitment of 3.5% by 2035?"

The long delayed defence investment plan (DIP), due last autumn, provides the Ministry of Defence (MoD) with an additional £15bn but falls short of the £28bn required to achieve the recommendations accepted by the government in last year’s Strategic Defence Review.

The uplift sees additional money allocated for drone production, unmanned navy vessels and the nuclear deterrent, but has been accused of not modernising and equipping the military quickly enough.

• Essex plane crash: Emergency services scrambled to scene in High Ongar

Ten years on from the vote to leave the EU, support us now in our campaign for a proper Brexit.

10p per day for a year, £36.50 for the year.

Offer available for ten days only.

Click HERE to subscribe to enjoy unlimited access to exclusive interviews, opinion and analysis, special offers and an ad-lite experience.

The plan has been the subject of significant “wrangling” between the Treasury and MoD, with former Defence Secretary John Healey resigning last month after learning that the military would be given an uplift of just £13.5bn.

The plan will see defence spending rise to 2.68% of GDP by 2030, falling significantly short of that spent by key NATO allies and the 5% demanded by US President Donald Trump.

Mr Healey responded to the release on X, expressing concern that the UK would be spending just 2.7% of GDP in 2030, the year NATO has warned Russia could attack.

He said: “European security is at stake. The PM has said today that 3% must be the number 1 priority for the next spending review.

Defence Select Committee member Mike Martin MP believes that the level of funding outlined by the Prime Minister leaves the UK vulnerable.

He told the Daily Express: “The main point is two weeks ago John Healey resigned and said the amount offered in the DIP left us unsafe. We have seen a small increase since, but does that make us safe? I don’t think so.

“Look at what is happening in Ukrainian cities or happened to our allies in the Middle East where they faced a barrage of drones and missiles - we have no defence against that.”

There will also be funding for a “hybrid” Royal Navy, with smaller, autonomous vessels working alongside crewed ships, coming at the expense of Type 45 Destroyers.

Martin added: “We now see our only protection from ballistic missiles in Type 45 Destroyers being ditched for uncrewed vessels, which are nothing more than a PowerPoint slide.”

Some £64 billion is due to be spent on nuclear weapons, fuel and technology.

The uplift will also see the MoD adopt novel technologies as it evolves from a military of rifles and fully-crewed vehicles to meet the demands of the modern battlefield.

The Government has pledged more than £5 billion of spending over the next four years to fund a “drone transformation” for the armed forces, learning the lessons from Ukraine, where drones account for around 90% of enemy kills.

Alexander Fitzgerald, CEO and Founder of Isembard, urged the Government to concentrate on investing in an industrial base that is able to scale production of drones and other vital equipment and pace and scale.

He said: “Factories win wars. And high rates of production build factories. So let’s stop agonising about this plan and commit to increasing production today. Drones, rockets and satellites will not build themselves.

“Every hour we wait sends a shiver down my spine”.

Sir Keir said he would not cut day-to-day spending on frontline services to fund the DIP, but had scrapped some capital projects that were not “immediately vital”.

These included some roads and energy projects, he said.

The release of the plan despite the Prime Minister’s resignation is seen by many as an attempt to firm up his legacy on defence before he leaves office.

Officials told this paper that the Government’s commitment to defence was absolute, promising that it would be the priority in the next spending review.

This comes despite uncertainty over who will be the occupants of 10 and 11 Downing Street at that time.

Andy Burnham, the favourite to be the next occupant of No. 10, is believed to see the DIP as "settled".

Sources close to the potential next Prime Minister told the Daily Express: "It’s important for confidence in the defence industry and preparedness that the investments are delivered."