Brooks Nader Narrowly Avoids Wardrobe Malfunction While Going Braless in Plunging Dress on a Yacht

Brooks Nader’s sizzling hot style isn’t going anywhere — despite her frequent wardrobe malfunctions.
Nader, 28, took to her Instagram Stories on Tuesday, June 30, to show off a risqué look while enjoying a yacht getaway. In the clip, which she filmed inside her bathroom, the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit model rocked a black dress featuring a plunging neckline that exposed her cleavage. The rest of her dress was complete with a halter neckline, an open back and sides that dipped so low her fans got a front row seat to her sideboob.
Nader was quick to adjust her dress while turning to the side, ensuring that she didn’t spill out of the number. One of her sisters then shoved Brooks out of the frame to get her moment in the spotlight, causing Brooks to grab the front of her dress to conceal herself. In true older sister fashion, Brooks pushed her right back.
The Love Thy Nader star accessorized her daring look with oversized black shades, a chunky cross necklace and matching earrings.
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
Deal of the Day
Deal Alert! This 44%-Off Throw-On Mini Dress Is Too Good to Leave in Your Cart View Deal
For glam, she donned sunkissed skin and glossy lips. She pulled her blonde hair back into an updo and gave the camera a pout.
This isn’t the first time Nader nearly had a nip slip. Last month, she ended up topless during Miami Swim Week while swimming in a little red dress featuring off-the-shoulder straps. She ended up sitting on a man’s shoulders, causing her strap to fall down her chest. Nader handled it like a pro, quickly covering up by placing her hand over her chest. She attempted to fix the dress, but the number, which was then drenched with water, clung to the model’s body.
Nader previously opened up to Us Weekly about her nip slips, laughing, “You said it, not me! This is true. I have been known to have a nip slip every now and then. That’s why it’s so shocking I’m getting this [Breakthrough Fashion Talent] award, but I’m honored.”
Just For You
In this article
Brooks Nader
House Votes Down Rashida Tlaib's Lebanon War Powers Resolution
PoliticsHouse Votes Down Rashida Tlaib’s Lebanon War Powers Resolution
(Photo by Paul Morigi/Getty Images for MomsRising)
Nicole Silverio
Capitol Hill Reporter
June 30, 2026
5:56 PM ET
June 30, 2026 5:56 PM ET
Nicole Silverio
Capitol Hill Reporter
Font Size:
Nearly two dozen Democrats voted with Republicans Tuesday to reject Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s war powers resolution.
The resolution would direct President Donald Trump to remove troops from hostilities in Lebanon, with 22 Democrats joining Republicans who voted against it. The resolution failed to pass in a 189-235 vote.
Tlaib introduced a concurrent resolution, meaning it was not legally binding and would not reach Trump’s desk for a signature.
Among the Democrats who voted against the resolution were Reps. Henry Cuellar of Texas, Tom Suozzi of New York, Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and Brad Sherman of California. Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie voted for the resolution. (RELATED: 38 Senators Aren’t Buying Trump’s Claim That Iran War Is ‘Terminated.’ They Want To See Receipts)
189-235: House for a second time this year defeated a non-binding Lebanon war powers resolution by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) to block U.S. military action against Lebanon unless approved by Congress. Republicans Boebert & Massie joins 187 Democrats in voting Yes. House defeated… https://t.co/SNG1k1c6Mk pic.twitter.com/iylxslxaOC
— Craig Caplan (@CraigCaplan) June 30, 2026
Republican Florida Rep. Brian Mast, the chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, questioned the timing of the resolution since the U.S. is not at war with Lebanon.
“There are not U.S. combat forces conducting operations or engaged in hostilities in Lebanon,” Mast said during debate on the House floor. “They are training the Lebanese Armed Forces.
The Trump administration, Israel and Lebanon agreed to a framework that would limit Iran’s influence in Lebanon and pave the way for Israel’s withdrawal from the territory.
During an appearance at the G7 Summit in France, Trump expressed frustration with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for continuing to bomb Lebanon as negotiations were ongoing with Iran. The administration expressed concerns that Israel could disrupt the peace process by continuing with their military actions.
Vice President J.D. Vance fired back at the Israeli government over their frustrations with the U.S., stating that they should not be attacking the only powerful ally they had left.
The House rejected a separate Lebanon war powers resolution introduced by Tlaib in early June, with 117 Democrats voting against it. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries argued at the time that no U.S. service members were involved in operations or hostilities with Lebanon. He voted in favor of the newest resolution.
The House and Senate passed a war powers resolution directing Trump to remove U.S. forces from hostilities against Iran other than those “necessary to defend the United States” or an ally from an “imminent attack.” The concurrent resolution sponsored by Democratic New York Rep. Gregory Meeks was not legally binding, though Trump reportedly railed against its passage during a lunch with Senate Republicans Wednesday.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
House Skipping Town Early As SAVE America Act Saga Continues To Rock Capitol Hill
PoliticsHouse Skipping Town Early As SAVE America Act Saga Continues To Rock Capitol Hill
(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
Nicole Silverio
Capitol Hill Reporter
June 30, 2026
5:21 PM ET
June 30, 2026 5:21 PM ET
Nicole Silverio
Capitol Hill Reporter
Font Size:
The House will enter an early recess Tuesday after several Republicans voted down a procedural rules vote, Speaker Mike Johnson’s office confirmed to the Daily Caller News Foundation.
The House voted against a procedural vote Tuesday that would allow debate on attaching the Safeguard America Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The lower chamber is scheduled to enter the July 4 recess and not return until July 13.
Republican Reps. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, Chip Roy of Texas, Victoria Spartz of Indiana, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Eric Burlison of Missouri, Randy Fine of Florida, Eli Crane of Arizona, Max Miller of Ohio, Andy Harris of Maryland, Mike Turner of Ohio, Keith Self of Texas and Lauren Boebert of Colorado voted against the rule. (RELATED: Here Are All The Times Congressional Lawmakers Gave Themselves A Vacation In Past Year)
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise voted “no” as a procedural move to offer a motion to reconsider the vote. Scalise’s procedural vote could allow the vote to be taken up again, which usually happens after more negotiations or adjustments.
Luna introduced an amendment to attach the SAVE America to the NDAA, threatening to shut down all rules votes if the SAVE Act was not attached. Johnson planned to attach the SAVE America Act through a special process called “MIRVing,” where lawmakers attach unrelated bills into a single massive package.
Luna argued the SAVE America Act language should be directly added to the NDAA’s text so it would be harder for the Senate to remove it. The Republican holdouts agreed with Luna and rejected the “MIRVing” procedure.
Johnson said during a press gaggle that these Republicans voted against the SAVE America Act by rejecting the rules vote.
“I am very sad to tell you, because in the rule we would have had the merge, which means we merge together, literally, the SAVE America Act that we passed unanimously back in February, with the National Defense Authorization Act. Those two bills would have become one and been transmitted to the Senate in that way,” Johnson said.
🚨🚨 @SpeakerJohnson on GOP colleagues voting down rules vote on attaching SAVE America Act to NDAA:
“We had a handful of Republicans who voted against its advancement. They also, as you know, as a consequence, voted against the SAVE America Act.”
“I am very sad to tell you,…
— Nicole Silverio (@NicoleMSilverio) June 30, 2026
Johnson met with President Donald Trump to diffuse the situation among the holdouts Thursday. Trump called on Republicans to unite and not vote against any rules in a Thursday Truth Social post.
The Senate entered recess early Thursday after Senate Republicans attended a heated lunch with Trump, who pressured them to pass the SAVE America Act and railed against the passage of a concurrent war powers resolution. Any senator could have objected or blocked the adjournment, though no one did.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Labour blasted for 'prioritising' benefits over 'clear plan' on defence
Labour blasted for 'prioritising' benefits over 'clear plan' on defence
Sir Keir Starmer has been blasted by critics after his long-awaited defence investment plan failed to stump up the cash the military needs.
Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied
Labour's unwillingness to cut welfare to fund defence has been blasted as a poison pill for the next decade of funding for the armed forces.
The accusation came last night after the release of Sir Keir Starmer's long-awaited funding package to re-arm and future-proof the military.
Get exclusive defence news and analysis from our experts and more Invalid emailWe use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy
But defence insiders warned that the cash was still below 2.68%, prompting two of his own defence ministers to quit in protest earlier this month.
It also creates an almighty headache for potential incoming Prime Minister Andy Burnham, after a nearly £5billion black hole was exposed in the scheme - meaning he'd have to cut budgets or slam up taxes.
Speaking to the Express, the Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge agreed that Mr Burnham was the wrong Prime Minister for an uncertain world.
He warned that Mr Burnham had made a huge speech about the rewiring of the country, but Mr Cartlidge asked: "What about the rewiring of defence?"
"Where is the defence of the realm, which is the number one responsibility of any government? Where was that in his speech?" he blasted.
In a warning shot to the PM-to-be, he added: "If the government doesn't have a plan to cut welfare and fund defence [...] they are not going to be successful."
Even the former Defence Secretary John Healey said: “More needs to be done in the months ahead”.
But he warned that the country needed to "develop a clear, credible funding plan" that would mean the UK could hit its NATO spending commitment of 3.5% by 2035?"
The long delayed defence investment plan (DIP), due last autumn, provides the Ministry of Defence (MoD) with an additional £15bn but falls short of the £28bn required to achieve the recommendations accepted by the government in last year’s Strategic Defence Review.
The uplift sees additional money allocated for drone production, unmanned navy vessels and the nuclear deterrent, but has been accused of not modernising and equipping the military quickly enough.
Ten years on from the vote to leave the EU, support us now in our campaign for a proper Brexit.
10p per day for a year, £36.50 for the year.
Offer available for ten days only.
Click HERE to subscribe to enjoy unlimited access to exclusive interviews, opinion and analysis, special offers and an ad-lite experience.
The plan has been the subject of significant “wrangling” between the Treasury and MoD, with former Defence Secretary John Healey resigning last month after learning that the military would be given an uplift of just £13.5bn.
The plan will see defence spending rise to 2.68% of GDP by 2030, falling significantly short of that spent by key NATO allies and the 5% demanded by US President Donald Trump.
Mr Healey responded to the release on X, expressing concern that the UK would be spending just 2.7% of GDP in 2030, the year NATO has warned Russia could attack.
He said: “European security is at stake. The PM has said today that 3% must be the number 1 priority for the next spending review.
Defence Select Committee member Mike Martin MP believes that the level of funding outlined by the Prime Minister leaves the UK vulnerable.
He told the Daily Express: “The main point is two weeks ago John Healey resigned and said the amount offered in the DIP left us unsafe. We have seen a small increase since, but does that make us safe? I don’t think so.
“Look at what is happening in Ukrainian cities or happened to our allies in the Middle East where they faced a barrage of drones and missiles - we have no defence against that.”
There will also be funding for a “hybrid” Royal Navy, with smaller, autonomous vessels working alongside crewed ships, coming at the expense of Type 45 Destroyers.
Martin added: “We now see our only protection from ballistic missiles in Type 45 Destroyers being ditched for uncrewed vessels, which are nothing more than a PowerPoint slide.”
Some £64 billion is due to be spent on nuclear weapons, fuel and technology.
The uplift will also see the MoD adopt novel technologies as it evolves from a military of rifles and fully-crewed vehicles to meet the demands of the modern battlefield.
The Government has pledged more than £5 billion of spending over the next four years to fund a “drone transformation” for the armed forces, learning the lessons from Ukraine, where drones account for around 90% of enemy kills.

Alexander Fitzgerald, CEO and Founder of Isembard, urged the Government to concentrate on investing in an industrial base that is able to scale production of drones and other vital equipment and pace and scale.
He said: “Factories win wars. And high rates of production build factories. So let’s stop agonising about this plan and commit to increasing production today. Drones, rockets and satellites will not build themselves.
“Every hour we wait sends a shiver down my spine”.
Sir Keir said he would not cut day-to-day spending on frontline services to fund the DIP, but had scrapped some capital projects that were not “immediately vital”.
These included some roads and energy projects, he said.
The release of the plan despite the Prime Minister’s resignation is seen by many as an attempt to firm up his legacy on defence before he leaves office.
Officials told this paper that the Government’s commitment to defence was absolute, promising that it would be the priority in the next spending review.
This comes despite uncertainty over who will be the occupants of 10 and 11 Downing Street at that time.
Andy Burnham, the favourite to be the next occupant of No. 10, is believed to see the DIP as "settled".
Sources close to the potential next Prime Minister told the Daily Express: "It’s important for confidence in the defence industry and preparedness that the investments are delivered."