Why didn’t Real Madrid want Victor Munoz for €8m, when Liverpool paid €40m?

Why didn’t Real Madrid want Victor Munoz for €8m, when Liverpool paid €40m?

Munoz made his senior debut with Madrid, but was also trained at Barcelona, the city of his birth (Alex Caparros/Getty Images)
By Mario CorteganaJune 19, 2026 UpdatedLiverpool confirmed the signing of Osasuna and Spain winger Victor Munoz on Thursday, meeting his €40million release clause and beating Newcastle to his signature.
Real Madrid could have signed the 22-year-old for €8million (£6.9m; $9.2m) this summer — but they chose not to.
Some figures at the Spanish club, particularly within the academy, where Munoz was trained, have been left with mixed feelings. There is a sense of surprise over Madrid deciding against giving Munoz, now at the World Cup with Luis de la Fuente’s side, a chance to show what he can do at the Bernabeu. This is a feeling shared by the player himself.
So why did Madrid turn him down? And how come they had the option to choose?
Informed by conversations with several sources familiar with the case, who all spoke anonymously to protect relationships, The Athletic explains.
Munoz is a graduate of Madrid’s La Fabrica youth academy and the club sold him to Osasuna last July in a €5million deal (including a further €1m with potential add-ons, of which almost all were triggered). That agreement also included several buyback options valid over the first three seasons of the five-year contract he signed.
The first of those options stood at €8million this summer.
When Madrid sold Munoz to Osasuna, he had played just 47 first-team minutes across four appearances, including a debut as an 88th-minute substitute in a 4-3 La Liga defeat at Barcelona in May 2025 — in which Munoz had a great chance to equalise but fired over the bar.
Following criticism he received from Madrid’s fanbase over that miss, he closed the comments section on his Instagram account for a long period.
Munoz’s progress over the following 2025-26 campaign with Osasuna was dazzling, with the winger emerging as one of the breakout stars in Spain’s top flight, making his international debut in March and attracting interest from Barcelona — where he spent three years as a youth player from 2014 to 2017.
Munoz playing in El Clasico for Madrid on May 2025 (Alex Caparros/Getty Images)Barca’s interest eventually faded, in no small part due to Madrid’s positioning. Madrid would not have been happy for Munoz to end up at their direct rivals, even if Munoz was born and grew up there before arriving at Real Madrid in 2021, just before turning 18.
In theory, if Barca had indicated their intention to trigger Munoz’s release clause, Madrid would have been able to step in and activate their own option instead, as another condition of his sale to Osasuna last year gave them right of first refusal.
There were voices within Madrid who were in favour of his return. They liked the idea of bringing an academy graduate back, and a Spanish player at that, also appreciating his skill set as a pure winger — a role not particularly well represented in the squad.
When some reports in Spain suggested it would happen, the response from all parties to The Athletic was that no final decision had been made and, consequently, no formal communication had taken place.
What You Should Read Next
Liverpool sign Victor Munoz: How do they keep beating Newcastle United to players?
Newcastle United were convinced Victor Munoz was destined for St James' Park. On Thursday, he was confirmed as a Liverpool player
Munoz himself did have reservations about a return, aware of how difficult it is for academy players to break into and progress in Madrid’s first team. Sources close to the player said that they saw a more stable path to the top at Barcelona than at Madrid.
Madrid were opposed to him joining Barca but following Jose Mourinho’s appointment as manager and internal discussions over squad strengths and recruitment for next season, it became clear they did not see bringing him back as a priority.
Barca were not the only interested party, though. Premier League clubs began to appear and this began to be seen as Munoz’s most likely destination.
Munoz pictured with Spain team-mates Lamine Yamal and Nico Williams (Florencia Tan Jun/Getty Images)
Another factor behind the decision not to re-sign Munoz was financial. Madrid’s deal with Osasuna last year also included a 50 per cent sell-on clause, meaning they would earn €20million if his release clause was met.
Madrid’s board believes receiving a total of around €26million (including his €5million sale with add-ons in 2025) for a player who made just four first-team appearances represents good business.
Munoz can play on either wing and his versatility was admired, but both flanks are considered to be covered by Vinicius Junior, Rodrygo (once he returns from injury), Brahim Diaz, Franco Mastantuono (whom Mourinho likes) and Endrick.
Mourinho wants to try the latter on the wing, where he at times featured for Lyon on loan during the second half of this past season, as well as in the No 9 role. The versatile Bernardo Silva, who has just arrived, is another option out wide.
As other transfer priorities were identified, Madrid closed agreements with Ibrahima Konate and Silva (both free transfers), the €60million deal for Marc Cucurella and are ready to spend €20m on Inter right-back Denzel Dumfries.
Madrid and Mourinho still want to land another centre-back and one more creative midfielder. For this reason, sales such as Munoz’s will be required.
Even still, not everyone sees it that simply, especially in the academy.
While the board celebrates success, some coaches and staff believe it sends a disappointing message to the club’s younger players: even if you do very well, making it into the first team is impossible.
Jun 24, 2026Connections: Sports Edition
Spot the pattern. Connect the terms
Find the hidden link between sports terms
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'