The Knicks didn’t just build a championship team. They built deep partnerships

Knicks Parade
RecapBrunson's Message to CriticsCelebrating The WinThe Knicks didn’t just build a championship team. They built deep partnerships

Jose Alvarado, left, and Karl-Anthony Towns celebrate the Knicks' title. Angelina Katsanis / Getty Images
By Spencer HarrisonJune 22, 2026 UpdatedThis story is part of Peak, The Athletic’s desk covering the mental side of sports. Sign up for Peak’s newsletter here.
Spencer Harrison is a professor of organizational behavior at INSEAD and an expert on culture. He is also an NBA fan who grew up in Salt Lake City during the John Stockton-Karl Malone era of the Utah Jazz.
High-performing organizations often look inevitable in retrospect. This is equally true in sports and business.
When the confetti falls, hindsight bias sneaks in. Trades, draft picks and salary-cap maneuvers suddenly seem rational, even obvious. But my research and work with organizational leaders show there are some decisions that consistently pay off.
One asset that is key to organizational success is typically built long before anyone recognizes it: deep partnerships. Partnerships are relationships where each member of the relationship benefits from the other. Deep partnerships are relationships that continue to produce mutual benefits over time, even when the relationships come under stress. They create reservoirs of confidence, information and shared hope that can be drawn upon when opportunities appear or crises occur.
The New York Knicks’ championship run offers a powerful example.
Many of the key relationships that made the Knicks such a formidable team existed before many of the players arrived in New York.
Leon Rose, the Knicks’ president of basketball operations, spent nearly two decades as one of the NBA’s most influential agents. Long before he assembled a championship roster, he was building relationships across the league. His network became a strategic asset that few organizations could replicate.
Alongside Rose was William “World Wide Wes” Wesley, a legendary basketball connector whose influence was built through decades of relationships spanning players, coaches, executives, apparel companies, musicians and business leaders. Wesley’s value was never simply who he knew. It was the trust embedded within those relationships.
The Knicks’ MVP, Jalen Brunson, illustrates how these relationships compounded over time. His connection to the organization was not merely contractual.
His father, Rick Brunson, played for the Knicks and later developed close working relationships with former coach Tom Thibodeau and other members of the organization’s leadership. Rose had represented the Brunson family for years before either joined the Knicks.
When New York signed Jalen Brunson in 2022, it was not betting on a stranger. The Knicks were investing in someone they knew deeply.
Brunson was hardly the only example. The Knicks gradually assembled players whose relationships predated their arrival in New York. Brunson, Josh Hart and Mikal Bridges won national championships together at Villanova. The front office was not simply acquiring talent. It was acquiring a dense network of players who already trusted one another, understood one another’s tendencies and had years of shared experience navigating pressure together.
These relationships might seem incidental to success, but as an organizational scholar, the evidence shows they are crucial.
Research on social capital has consistently shown that relationships create value. In business, the deep partnerships the Knicks acquired and continued to develop allow information to flow more seamlessly, facilitating faster coordination and a willingness to experiment.
Research also shows that when people build strong relationships, both members of the relationship tend to benefit. In sales, this often leads to longer and more successful partnerships. On teams, it can make it easier to resolve conflicts, collaborate effectively and find creative ways to tackle difficult problems.
Research by professor Jane Dutton and colleagues shows that these sorts of high-quality connections are valuable not simply because partners like each other more. Rather, the nature of the relationship increases the capacity to perform under stress: Teams become adaptable because the relationships can support honesty while giving each other space to take risks.
In basketball terms, that means having players who know each other’s tendencies before training camp begins. It means trusting in each other when difficult conversations might threaten to fracture the group. It means an enduring sense of hope even during a losing streak.
Organizations often make the mistake of investing in individuals instead of investing in partnerships. The reason is understandable: Individual performance is visible and immediate, while relationship quality is harder to measure.
The distinction is similar to the difference between trading and investing. Traders focus on quarterly returns and immediate gains. Investors understand that wealth is created through small, consistent contributions that compound over decades.
Partnerships operate much the same way. Every conversation, shared challenge, act of support and difficult conflict resolved constructively becomes a small deposit into a relational account. Most days, the balance appears unchanged. But when a crisis emerges or an unexpected opportunity appears, organizations discover whether they have accumulated enough trust to draw upon.
If leaders wait until the crisis arrives to build relationships, they are already too late. Deep partnerships, like financial capital, can only be a resource after they have been invested in.
This is why the Knicks’ championship is ultimately not about how they played basketball. It is a reminder that resilient organizations are rarely built in the moment of success.
Championships may be won in June. But the deep partnerships that make them possible are often built long before.
Jun 24, 2026Connections: Sports Edition
Spot the pattern. Connect the terms
Find the hidden link between sports terms
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'