Supreme Court rules ballots arriving after Election Day can be counted, in win for Dems
- US News
- World News
- Page Six
- Sports
- Post Sports+
- Sports Betting
- Business
- Opinion
- Entertainment
- Shopping
- Lifestyle
- Health
- Real Estate
- Alexa
- Media
- Tech
- Science
- Astrology
- Video
- Photos
- Pod Force One
- NY POSTcast
Switch between CA and NY editions here.
Editiontrending now in US News
Skip to main content
Vile footage shows Texas sisters Cookie and Kitty grin as...
Mom tried calling best pal minutes before being butchered,...
Horrific video shows huge crocodile that killed tourist in front...
The insane temps NYC will hit this week as ‘heat...
Nancy Guthrie suspects sent latest ransom note as ‘mea...
Suspected murderer drops dead of heart attack while dumping body...
Baby almost beaten to death by other kids after moms allegedly...
Victim of horrific crocodile attack in beloved resort town...
Politics
Supreme Court rules ballots arriving after Election Day can be counted, in win for Dems
By Ryan King Published June 29, 2026 Updated June 29, 2026, 12:51 p.m. ETSee more of our coverage in your search results.
Add The New York Post on GoogleWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted up to five days after the polls close, handing Democrats a massive win heading into the midterm elections.
The 5-4 ruling saw Chief Justice John Roberts and conservative Amy Coney Barrett side with their liberal peers in concluding that nothing in federal law requires all ballots to be collected by Election Day.
“The Framers recognized the difficulty of crafting election laws ‘applicable to every probable change in the situation of the country,'” Barrett wrote in the majority opinion. “So instead of constitutionalizing election law, they decided that ‘a discretionary power over election’ needed to be lodged ‘somewhere.'”
6
6
“Suffice it to say, that power was not lodged in this Court. The election-day statutes say nothing about ballot receipt, and we cannot add to the words Congress chose.”
Explore More
Vile footage shows Texas sisters Cookie and Kitty grin as they’re busted for allegedly hacking mom of 5 to death
Mom tried calling best pal minutes before being butchered, allegedly by Texas sisters Kitty and Cookie
The insane temps NYC will hit this week as ‘heat dome’ engulfs area — and meteorologist issues July 4 warning
The case, Watson v. RNC, stemmed from a 2024 lawsuit by the Republican National Committee and several local parties against the Magnolia State over its five-day grace period.
At least 13 other states have similar post-Election Day counting laws on their books, while nearly 30 states give certain types of mail-in voters some extra time to turn in their ballots. California is perhaps the most infamous of those states, with many key races unsettled for more than a week after polls close.
“The electorate’s choice is made when voting is complete, not when ballots are received,” Barrett wrote. “The most recent amendment to the Presidential election-day statute bears this out. In 2022, Congress inserted the phrase ‘election day’ into that statute and marked that day as a specific Tuesday. It then created an exception: When States ‘modif[y] the period of voting.'”
“That Congress defined ‘election day’ with reference to ‘voting’ indicates that ‘voting’ is the act governed by the statute.”
6
President Trump has long been a fierce critic of states that allow the late counting of ballots and the Justice Department backed the RNC suit.
During oral arguments in March, the justices appeared deeply divided and grappled with concerns about whether nixing Mississippi’s policy could threaten the practice of early voting altogether.
“It just seems inconceivable that on the basis of this kind of evidence, we would reject these practices that are so entrenched in 30 states,” liberal Justice Elena Kagan said at one point.
6
Kagan’s fellow liberal, Ketanji Brown Jackson, had attempted to nudge her colleagues away from siding against Mississippi, telling attorneys for the RNC: “The worry is that you want this court to decide the case rather than have Congress do it.”
Four conservative justices — Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Brett Kavanaugh — dissented, with Alito underscoring in his written opinion that federal law sets Election Day as “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November.”
“If ballots received after election day are added to the set of ballots that dictate the election’s outcome, the electorate’s choice does not occur on election day, and the federal election-day statutes are violated,” he wrote.
Alito also criticized the majority opinion for concluding that federal law merely requires an “individual cast a vote on or before election day.”
6
“But if that is all that the election-day statutes require, there is no sense in which the electorate as a whole can be seen as making its choice on election day,” he contended.
Monday’s decision comes as Trump has pressed Congress to tighten restrictions on mail-in ballots and enact a proof of citizenship requirement to vote in federal elections.
Trump has specifically called for the passage of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, which has been stuck in the Senate.
6
“If we want fair and secure elections, Election Day should mean exactly what it says, which is why this decision makes it even more imperative that Congress pass the SAVE America Act,” RNC Chairman Joe Gruters said in a statement.
“Democrats are inviting chaos at the ballot box by allowing elections to drag on for days and weeks after voters cast their ballots. Republicans are not going to be deterred by this decision, and the RNC will keep fighting to have elections end on Election Day as Americans want.”
Filed under Read Next Nearly half of Maine voters say Graham Platner 'too extrem...Trending Now on NYPost.com
-
This story has been shared 49,985 times.
49,985
Vile footage shows Texas sisters Cookie and Kitty grin as they’re busted for allegedly hacking mom of 5 to death
-
This story has been shared 41,842 times.
41,842
Golf star’s ex-wife speaks out on social media after Phil Mickelson explicit photo allegations
-
This story has been shared 37,697 times.
37,697
French bombshell dubbed ‘the most beautiful girl in the world’ as a kid gets married at 25
Most Commented Join the conversation
-
This story has 2.4K comments.
2.4K
Mamdani won’t enforce SCOTUS ruling on deportation protection for Haitians, Syrians
-
This story has 1.8K comments.
1.8K
NYC enacts rent freeze on 1M stabilized units after Mamdani is accused of stacking board
-
This story has 1.6K comments.
1.6K
JD Vance tells Bill Maher how ‘America wins’ with or without Iran deal
Now on Page Six
-
Bravo stars Kyle Cooke and Ava Dash spotted kissing in the Hamptons after denying they are dating
-
This no-makeup makeup stick is a ‘staple’ in Jennifer Aniston’s ‘glow routine’
-
Kevin Spacey ‘feels much more welcome’ in Hollywood after sexual assault trials
Video
Now on Decider
See All
More Stories
Page Six
Daveigh Chase’s cause of death revealed
Decider
Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Agent Kim Reactivated’ On Netflix, Where A Mild-Mannered Office Worker Dregs Up His Black Ops Past When His Daughter Goes Missing
NYPost
Vile footage shows Texas sisters Cookie and Kitty grin as they’re busted for allegedly hacking mom of 5 to death
© 2026 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use Subscription Terms Privacy Notice SitemapYour California Privacy Rights
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'
Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
