Sean McAdam: Red Sox somehow keep finding new lows
On a Monday night, in a mid-season game against the worst – and unquestionably most anonymous – team in the National League, the Red Sox saw the perfect metaphor for their nightmarish 2026 season play out.
Something had to give in a game between the American League team with the fewest wins facing off with their counterparts in the National League.
AdvertisementAdvertisementBut even allowing for that, this one bordered on the unbelievable.
Leading 2-0 heading into the bottom of the ninth and with the game’s most reliable closer on the mound, the Red Sox somehow coughed up the lead and earned a 3-2 walk-off loss to the Colorado Rockies.
Because of course they did.
Did we mention that it happened on a walk-off triple?
The Red Sox hadn’t lost a game in which they led after seven innings all season, and it was as if they had spent the last few weeks making certain that when they invariably did, it would be one that no one would forget.
“(Losing a late-inning lead) doesn’t happen to us very often. It hasn’t happened all year,” said interim manager Chad Tracy to reporters postgame. “Whether (a loss) happens late in the ninth or earlier in the game, they all sting. They all sting. It doesn’t sting any worse.”
AdvertisementAdvertisementThat much is up for debate, I suppose. But there’s no getting around the absurdity of the late-inning details.
The Rockies had flirted with tying the game an inning earlier before apparently deciding it would be more entertaining to wait until the ninth. Colorado connected for four straight eighth inning hits off Garrett Whitlock, but because of some boneheaded baserunning, made two outs on the bases and came away without a run.
First, an overly aggressive send with one out resulted in Edouard Julien running into an easy out at first base. Next, Willi Castro considered going first-to-third on a single before realizing that teammate Mickey Moniak had taken up residence at third. Castro was then tagged out returning to second, ending the Rockies’ threat.
It was the first time since 1990 that the Red Sox had allowed four hits in one inning and not allowed a run. But it was only a temporary stay of execution.
AdvertisementAdvertisementEnter Chapman an inning later, who quickly yielded two singles. Next came a bunt try from Cole Carrigg, and with Willson Contreras crashing in from first, third baseman Caleb Durbin fielded the ball at third. But second baseman Andruw Monasterio was late covering the first base bag, forcing Durbin to double-pump a throw to first as Carrigg was safe by a half-step, loading the bases.
BETTING: Red Sox -1.5 run line odds are currently sitting at +230 on FanDuel for Tuesday’s contest versus the Rockies. Our FanDuel Sportsbook review will show you how to register and use their app. Also, check out our MLB betting guide if you’re interested in finding out more about how to bet on baseball.
McCarthy then hit a cue shot down the left field line that kicked off the wall, eluded Duran and gave the three Rockies time to circle the bases. McCarthy’s walk-off triple was only the sixth when trailing by two runs since the Divisional Era.
“In the moment of truth, the ball went to the (left field) corner,” said Chapman, “and you saw what happened.”
Chapman’s last blown save came July 23, 2025.
AdvertisementAdvertisement“That stuff is in the past,” he said. “It is what it is. (I) didn’t get the job done tonight. My job is to come through. Now, we just turn the page and look forward to the next game.”
The defeat was the 45th this season for the Red Sox, tying a franchise mark for most losses before July, set in 1996 and tied in 2014. Is there any question that a new record will be established in the next week, perhaps even Tuesday night?
The stunning loss managed to wipe out a host of positive developments from the night, including — but not limited to — a terrific start by rookie Jake Bennett (six shutout innings, a career-high nine strikeouts), a slump-busting RBI double from Contreras, and several standout plays from center fielder Ceddanne Rafaela.
But none of that will be remembered given how this one ended.
AdvertisementAdvertisementWhat will remain is the hideous ninth, and how it grotesquely represents all that’s gone wrong this season.
“Again,” concluded Tracy, “there’s not much to say.”
And that may well stand as the motto of the 2026 Red Sox.
More Red Sox coverage
Red Sox sign veteran catcher to minor league deal; former Yadier Molina backup had .962 OPS at AAA
Red Sox reactions: Rockies pull off stunning ninth-inning comeback
Red Sox lineup: Regular outfield alignment back together in spacious Coors Field
Read the original article on MassLive. Add MassLive as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'