Pochettino contract offer a smart, necessary step for U.S. Soccer, no matter the outcome

USMNT Latest
Pochettino Offered Contract ExtensionJersey Demand Sparks ShortageUSA Bandwagon USMNT Falls To TurkeyKnockout Opponent ConfirmedPuppies!Pochettino contract offer a smart, necessary step for U.S. Soccer, no matter the outcome

Head coach Mauricio Pochettino of the United States talks to the media during a press conference. Jamie Squire / Getty Images
By Paul TenorioJune 26, 2026 Updated 4:06 pm EDTOffering a four-year extension to Mauricio Pochettino as coach of the U.S. men’s national team just before this World Cup made a lot of sense for U.S. Soccer.
There was almost an obligation for the federation to signal to Pochettino not only that it wanted to keep him around, but that it believed in his approach to the job, his methods and the progress it was achieving. Letting him enter the World Cup as a lame duck coach without a contract offer could easily have been perceived as an insult, or an implicit impending break-up, for Pochettino and his staff.
The Athletic reported the news exclusively on Friday and while it may appear a logical step, it also symbolized a vital step toward a critical long-term goal.
What You Should Read Next
Mauricio Pochettino offered contract extension to lead USMNT for second World Cup cycle
Any decisions will be deferred until after the 2026 tournament, where the USMNT is into the knockout stage.
Pochettino’s biggest impact within the U.S. men’s national team was changing the culture and mindset of the program. Each national-team call-up had more value. Players’ role in the team was no longer guaranteed. It forced every single player in the pool to reckon with how much wearing the badge meant to them. And every single player in the pool believed they had a chance to make an impact in a U.S. jersey.
When I sat with Pochettino earlier this month at the team hotel in Southern California, I asked if he believed that would be his long-term legacy. That he re-instilled a mentality the federation had let slip away: the value of the badge, and not taking your spot in the national team for granted.
Pochettino disrupted what had become too casual of an approach to the national team, one that doesn’t exist anywhere else in the world. Turning down call-ups in Argentina or England or Germany isn’t a thing — at least not one that comes without long-term ramifications for that player.
“I think that’s fundamental because it raises the level of everyone,” Pochettino told me. “The Paraguay game showed that the talent exists. And when resources are distributed and the balance of power is leveled out — in a country this big, with an organization as significant as U.S. Soccer — when everyone operates at their best within their respective area, we are a very strong force. That was proven.”
USA continue to dream ahead of the round of 32Tom BogertU.S. Soccer’s task coming out of this World Cup was to ensure that whoever came next to coach the U.S. team was able to carry that mentality forward. It needed a profile as big as Pochettino because it needed someone with enough weight to institute those same simple standards. Someone who remained the most famous footballing personality in the room.
Pochettino could sell his approach, even when it didn’t make him the most popular person in the room, because his experience dictated that he could. Every single player in the U.S. locker room understood that Pochettino had coached the likes of Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappe and Neymar. That he had taken a team to a Champions League final. That experience allowed him to take a my-way-or-the-highway approach.
Whoever comes next needs to have the personality to carry that legacy forward. Because reinstating the mentality around the national team was critical. This wasn’t a new identity around the U.S. men’s national team. Listen to Clint Dempsey talk about what he used to do in order to get on the field for the national team.
“I’m someone who’s bled for this country,” Dempsey said on Fox. “I broke my nose playing for this country. I’ve come back from two heart procedures and played for this country.”
National team spirits lifted during the World Cup’s group stage. Jamie Squire / Getty ImagesIn another interview with the Unfiltered podcast, the U.S. legend made it even more clear: “If you’re going to bury me, bury me in a national team jersey.”
Keeping Pochettino is certainly one path toward extending the legacy of the culture he has pushed to instill in this program. But first, there’s an element of risk as this tournament plays out. If the U.S. loses to Bosnia and Herzegovina on July 1, it would become a much tougher decision. The narrative around this tournament would flip from success to failure.
And even if the U.S. advances, there are details that will be important to map out, not the least of which is the clear desire Pochettino has to return to coach in the Premier League. He hasn’t been shy about it. He’s said it in multiple interviews.
Does he want to come back? And if so, what does the buyout look like in his contract? U.S. Soccer should make clear that it wants a coach who is all-in on the job for four years.
Was there a reason behind Poch’s defensive press conference?Tom BogertThe most important point is making sure that whoever takes this team forward, whether Pochettino or a new head coach, protects against losing the gains Pochettino made in the last two years. The argument against second-cycle coaches is that it’s human nature to lean on players you trust, who have been through it with you. That it gets tougher to see new players coming through and the value they might add. That all coaches have favorites. U.S. Soccer also hasn’t had a checkered experience with second-cycle coaches, from Bruce Arena in 2006, to Bob Bradley being fired after the 2011 Gold Cup final, to Jurgen Klinsmann’s disastrous 2018 cycle and then Gregg Berhalter’s dismissal after a group-stage exit in the 2024 Copa América.
U.S. Soccer will no doubt believe fighting the instincts that challenge second-cycle coaches is an extension of the idea that Pochettino has worked so hard to dismiss: No one is guaranteed a spot. Whether or not Pochettino and U.S. Soccer reach an agreement, that can be his legacy with this national team.
First, though, Pochettino needs to demonstrate to the players and the public that his approach was the right one. That hinges on getting a win against Bosnia next week.
Jun 27, 2026Connections: Sports Edition
Spot the pattern. Connect the terms
Find the hidden link between sports terms
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'