Oilers hire Mike Babcock as head coach: Why they’re taking a chance on the controversial veteran

Oilers hire Mike Babcock as head coach: Why they’re taking a chance on the controversial veteran

Mike Babcock coached the Red Wings to a Stanley Cup win in 2008 but has had ugly exits from the Maple Leafs and Blue Jackets. Kyle Robertson / Imagn Images
By Chris Johnston, Aaron Portzline and Jonas SiegelJune 23, 2026 Updated 11:48 am EDTMike Babcock will return to an NHL bench for the first time in almost seven years after being hired to be the next head coach of the Edmonton Oilers on Tuesday.
Babcock was effectively lured out of retirement by the chance to coach a team with serious Stanley Cup aspirations.
Babcock last coached NHL games in November of 2019 for the Toronto Maple Leafs. He was fired that season after a sputtering 9-10-4 start. Babcock was hired by the Columbus Blue Jackets in July of 2023 before resigning two months later after allegations surfaced on the “Spittin’ Chiclets” podcast that he asked players to share personal photos on their phones with him.
Earlier this month, the Oilers consulted with the NHL Players’ Association on a potential return for Babcock. The NHLPA asked the NHL to conduct an investigation into Babcock’s time with the Blue Jackets before approving him to coach again. That investigation was deemed complete Thursday, and Babcock was cleared to return.
The 63-year-old arrives in Edmonton at a time when the organization is thirsting for a Cup breakthrough. The Oilers were beaten by the Florida Panthers in both the 2024 and 2025 Cup finals before taking a step back this season, finishing with 93 points and being ousted in the first round by the Anaheim Ducks.
That resulted in former coach Kris Knoblauch being fired on May 14.
Babcock has previously coached three teams to the Stanley Cup Final, winning in 2008 with the Detroit Red Wings, and was behind the bench when Canada won gold at both the 2010 and 2014 Olympics.
Former Ottawa Senators and Los Angeles Kings coach D.J. Smith will be on Babcock’s staff as an associate coach. Smith was an assistant coach under Babcock with the Maple Leafs.
What went wrong in Columbus
Babcock was a controversial hire in Columbus when the Blue Jackets announced him as their coach on July 1, 2023. He didn’t end up coaching a game, running a practice or even making it to training camp.
He resigned on Sept. 16 — only 78 days later, and four days before camp was to begin — when Blue Jackets players threatened a revolt after it was learned that Babcock had scrolled through multiple players’ cellphones during one-on-one offseason meetings, perusing their pictures to learn more about their private lives.
Former NHL player Paul Bissonnette was the first to make these interactions public on the “Spittin’ Chiclets” podcast.
“Upon reflection, it has become clear that continuing as head coach of the Columbus Blue Jackets was going to be too much of a distraction,” Babcock said in a statement at the time.
The Blue Jackets, who would have fired him if he hadn’t resigned, reached a contract settlement with him and promoted Pascal Vincent on short notice to coach the season. — Portzline
What went wrong in Toronto
Babcock promised “pain” when Brendan Shanahan picked him to take over the Leafs bench on a massive eight-year contract in 2015. And he was right. There was pain. But it was also clear that he was having an immediate impact. The 2015-16 Leafs weren’t good or even designed to be good — they were the worst team in the league, in fact — but Babcock had them playing hard, competitive hockey every night.
The next season, with a dazzling trio of rookies — Auston Matthews, Mitch Marner and William Nylander — at the forefront, the Leafs took a major step. They not only reached the playoffs but gave the Presidents’ Trophy-winning Washington Capitals a scare in the first round. The Leafs became one of the NHL’s top teams in the next two years, with back-to-back 100-point seasons, but lost to the Boston Bruins in the first round in two seven-game series, highlighted by Nazem Kadri suspensions.
Something crucial happened along the way: The Leafs replaced Lou Lamoriello as general manager with Kyle Dubas in the spring of 2018. Suddenly, the ground underneath Babcock, who had been hired months before Lamoriello took over, was less secure.
Babcock stuck around for another full season, but his job security became fraught when the Leafs lost that second first-round series to the Bruins in 2019. A sluggish start that fall sealed his fate. Dubas fired him after 23 games.
In the aftermath of his exit, unflattering portrayals of his coaching methods surfaced, including with a young Marner. There is no doubt that Babcock was hard on his players in Toronto (and elsewhere) — too hard, perhaps. He could be overly blunt and lacking in sentiment and never appeared to care if he was liked. Babcock famously scratched Toronto native Jason Spezza in the opener of the 2019-20 season, in what would have been Spezza’s Leafs debut, for no apparent reason.
He got in his own way with stuff like that.
But he was also clearly a very good coach and might have succeeded in Toronto in spite of his brasher qualities with a longer runway — or a suspension-free playoffs from Kadri in either 2018 or 2019. Babcock is as detail-oriented as they come, with exacting routines and methods. His practices are fast and to the point. He doesn’t like to waste time. His teams are prepared to play. He is unafraid to buck consensus, for better and worse. For years, he insisted that Zach Hyman was a legitimately influential force and the right choice to play with Matthews amid market scrutiny. He was right on that one and wrong when he overplayed an aging Patrick Marleau in the playoffs.
Matthews, Marner and Nylander all grew as players under Babcock’s watch, and when Morgan Rielly was still young in the league, Babcock purposefully played him in difficult minutes so that he would eventually develop into a top-pairing defenseman.
Was it a good tenure? In some ways, yes. In other ways, no. The right word to describe it really is “complicated.” — Siegel
Why the Oilers are taking the chance
The Oilers couldn’t possibly be in more of a win-now mode with superstar Connor McDavid set to begin a two-year contract extension in 2026-27 that effectively frames their window to contend for a championship.
They decided to take a chance on Babcock because he was one of the few candidates available who met their prerequisites: both highly experienced and highly successful. The Oilers initially targeted Bruce Cassidy but weren’t granted permission by the Vegas Golden Knights to speak with him. Cassidy was fired by Vegas on March 29 and remains under contract to the organization through next season.
Other candidates for the Oilers job included Craig Berube and Peter Laviolette, both former Cup champions.
The fact that McDavid and other veteran players were on board with Babcock’s hiring also played a role in this decision, per league sources. The sense is that the group believes it needs a hard-driving coach to push it over the top following the departure of the more mild-mannered Knoblauch.
Babcock is certainly demanding. His teams were known for playing an organized style, which helped build his reputation as one of his generation’s best coaches, but it remains to be seen how well that will translate after such a lengthy time between jobs.
Other than the 11 weeks he spent working for the Blue Jackets during the 2023 offseason, Babcock has largely remained out of the public eye. He coached the men’s team at the University of Saskatchewan during the 2021-22 season but hasn’t been seen at NHL events since his days in Toronto.
He will find himself under a big spotlight in Edmonton, where his biggest task will be getting the Oilers to improve their defensive play. He’s also tasked with getting a team led by McDavid, Leon Draisaitl and Evan Bouchard to the promised land.
For the Oilers, it’s Cup or bust. — Johnston
Jun 23, 2026Connections: Sports Edition
Spot the pattern. Connect the terms
Find the hidden link between sports terms
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'