2026 NBA

Draft

LIVE

Updates

1m ago

Live Picks Tracker Best Available Players AJ Dybantsa To WizardsGradesTop 75 Prospects Analysis

NBA Draft 2026 results: Grades, analysis, fits for every pick

AJ Dybantsa is congratulated by Chris Cenac Jr.

AJ Dybantsa, right, was the top pick in this year's NBA Draft. He's headed to the Wizards. Arturo Holmes / Getty Images

By Sam Vecenie and John HollingerJune 23, 2026 Updated 9:40 pm EDT

The 2026 NBA Draft is underway — taking place over two days — and The Athletic’s draft expert Sam Vecenie and front-office insider John Hollinger are analyzing each pick as it happens.

Explore Vecenie’s scouting summary from the 2026 NBA Draft Guide, Hollinger’s team fit and more below.

1. Washington Wizards

AJ Dybantsa | 6-9 | 19 years old

Overall 1 Wing 1 AJ Dybantsa BYU

Elite tools for a wing; could easily become a top-10 NBA player.

Read full profile ›

Dybantsa has better physical tools entering the NBA than any wing I’ve seen in a while. His ability to play with elite bend mixed with explosiveness allows him to consistently get into the teeth of the defense as a straight-line driver. In transition, he’s an absolute menace. His nose for the foul line is second to none in this draft class with his polished footwork and gathers. That’s what allowed him to be as monstrously productive as he was this season, averaging more than 25 points while shooting over 50 percent from the field. He is a historically notable scoring prospect as a big-time wing, and it helps that he showed major improvement as a shooter and passer this season after seemingly stagnating a bit in the year before he played at BYU.

However, the aspects of Dybantsa’s game beyond his scoring acumen are unpolished. He’s nowhere near as deficient a ballhandler as Ace Bailey as a big wing because of his ability to play with bend and drive, but he needs to tighten up with the ball to consistently make better passing reads. The strides were there this season, but to be a primary decision-maker in the NBA, the standard is almost impossibly high. Additionally, Dybantsa needs to show improvement on the defensive end, where his engagement and overall anticipation are not quite good enough.

Why AJ Dybantsa is the no. 1 prospect in this year's NBA DraftSam Vecenie

But if we’re drafting for ceiling-level outcomes at the top of the draft, Dybantsa’s mix of unique athletic traits and proven scoring ability gives him the highest apex of all the prospects in the class. There’s no better blend of size, power, length, athleticism and skill in this class, and his overall feel for the game on offense is not poor. Dybantsa’s weaknesses are also more fixable than the weaknesses of other prospects at this size. You can improve his ability to handle the ball, and he has shown enough vision and problem-solving skills on the ball to believe he’s growing there. He’s not a completely negative defender with his size and length, and he won’t be attacked on that end even if he still needs to work through his anticipation issues.

There are outcomes here where Dybantsa averages 30 points and six assists in his prime, providing slightly above-average defense. That player who would be in the All-NBA picture and could even find himself in MVP discussions. Dybantsa’s floor in his prime is probably in the ballpark of what Jaylen Brown’s was before his 29-point-per-game breakout this season: a 22-point-per-game scorer who is switchable on defense but messy off the ball with some questionable moments as a ballhandler and passer. That’s still a player who provides borderline All-Star-level talent. Dybantsa is the best combination of upside and floor in the class, which is why he is my No. 1 player.

Hollinger’s analysis: I had Cameron Boozer ranked higher, but a lot of smart people I respect disagree with me, and Dybantsa’s fit between Trae Young and Anthony Davis is hard to deny. And if ultimately the choice was between Dybantsa and Darryn Peterson, I thought Dybantsa was clearly the pick. I would give the Wizards a less flattering grade for Trae Young’s extension. Grade: B+

2. Utah Jazz

Darryn Peterson | 6-5 | 19 years old

Overall 3 Guard 1 Darryn Peterson Kansas

An elite shooter with All-NBA scoring guard upside, despite his strange Kansas year.

Read full profile ›

Peterson was as complete a guard as I’ve evaluated entering college basketball in a long while. He’s an aggressive shot hunter on the court, and I love the way that he went about improving his passing ability out of ball screens. Until this season at Kansas, he had never stagnated, continually working his way up a steady trajectory to the top of his recruiting class.

But then he plateaued with the Jayhawks, and there is a case that he took a step back in some respects — especially as a passer and playmaker. How much of it was because of injury? How much of it was because of the situation around him at Kansas? How much of it was because college basketball was harder than high school? Peterson’s performance raised questions, especially in regard to his decision-making and ability to consistently get paint touches. However, it’s possible these issues go away once he gets into an NBA offensive scheme.

I’m buying into what I saw in Peterson in high school. It’s exceptionally hard to find players who are this creative, who can make shots at this level at such a young age and who have at least demonstrated the ability to pass and defend at some point, even if those skills have been inconsistent. Yes, there are questions that Peterson needs to answer for NBA teams. But the talent is the talent, and Peterson projects to be the kind of player who can dribble, pass, shoot, defend and think the game at a high level as long as his development goes well in the next two years.

Hollinger’s analysis: You don’t draft for fit this high, but man, it would have been tough to slot Cameron Boozer into this Utah frontcourt without making other moves. I wonder if the Jazz should have looked harder at trading down. I had Peterson fourth on my board, but he fits perfectly on this roster, and the other two guys I had ahead of him don’t. Grade: B

3. Memphis Grizzlies

Cameron Boozer | 6-8 | 18 years old

Overall 2 Forward 1 Cameron Boozer Duke

Versatile, skilled forward with a brilliant offensive mind; needs to find a role on defense.

Read full profile ›

Boozer is one of the most statistically dominant players we’ve seen enter the NBA in a long time. He’s won at every single level and dominated with his play. He is multiskilled and incredibly versatile, which makes him exceptionally difficult to game plan for. As a scorer, he can beat you in ball screens both as a ballhandler and screener. He can beat you as a floor-spacing shooter. He can attack closeouts or he can post you up and score that way through his physicality. He has a brilliant basketball mind, passes incredibly well and understands how to put his teams into positive positions. I think he’s pretty close to a can’t-fail offensive prospect. I don’t see him as a Nikola Jokić-level processor of the game, and his lack of size compared to the Serbian star is an issue. However, I think the odds are that he’s above the level of Alperen Şengün, who has made two All-Star Games and been remarkably productive in the NBA.

Why Cameron Boozer produces and wins at every levelSam Vecenie

The only reason I don’t have Boozer at No. 1 is that I think his skills play better as a No. 2 type of star in the NBA as opposed to a No. 1. The odds are somewhat high that teams will take advantage of Boozer defensively, even though he’s a sharp decision-maker and processor with good hands. Additionally, I worry about him creating advantages in the NBA versus simply being one of the best players in the NBA at taking advantage of situations created for him. Still, I don’t see a world in which Boozer isn’t at least an excellent starter with significant All-Star upside, unless the defense really becomes a problem if his body fills out even more. I’d bet a lot on his versatility making him a multi-time All-NBA player in terms of his production.

Hollinger’s analysis: The Grizzlies get the guy that I had No. 1, and they possibly might have had first as well. Boozer should be the first major building block for what is going to be a full teardown rebuilding project in Memphis, ahead of a likely trade of Ja Morant this summer. Grade: A

4. Chicago Bulls

Caleb Wilson | 6-9 | 19 years old

Overall 4 Forward 2 Caleb Wilson North Carolina

Explosive athlete whose ceiling is as high as the top three, but has more flaws.

Read full profile ›

Wilson has huge upside athletically, which gives him an All-Star ceiling. His blend of power, explosiveness and coordination on his drives and transition gives him tools other players can’t match. When you combine that with his motor on offense and nose for the ball, it allows him to be remarkably productive. With further skill-based improvement, he has difference-making outcomes in his profile, similar to someone like Pascal Siakam, who has made multiple All-NBA teams.

But he could also become a great, productive four who doesn’t quite impact winning in the way you want if the skill level and defense don’t improve. He has a similar profile to John Collins as an athletic play-finishing big man if his defense and shot-creation skills don’t grow, though Wilson is more coordinated as a ballhandler and plays with quicker reactivity and twitch. Wilson could easily transition into more of a hybrid three/four wing if those pieces come along, or he could end up as more of an undersized four/five.

Wilson has serious upside, but he is more flawed than a few of the other elite players in the class. There are more pathways for him to become a good starter/rotation player than some of the others. His work ethic will tell the tale of what he becomes in the NBA. But if he’s willing to put in the right kind of work, the ceiling is remarkably high.

Hollinger’s analysis: The only logical pick after the top three names were off the board. Wilson has some positional overlaps with Matas Buzelis, the Bulls’ other best young player, but long term, they could be a towering pair of above-the-rim bookend forwards … as long as at least one of the two becomes a reliable shooter. Grade: A

5. LA Clippers

Keaton Wagler | 6-5 | 19 years old

Overall 6 Guard 3 Keaton Wagler Illinois

Superb processor with lethal jumper and unselfish mindset; a hard guard not to love.

Read full profile ›

Wagler is one of the more complete guard prospects I’ve evaluated in a while. He is a terrific bet to be a skilled dribble, pass and shoot player who can play both on and off the ball in an era when the NBA demands those skills from its perimeter players. He drills over 40 percent of his pull-up 3s and catch-and-shoot 3s, making him a serious floor-spacing threat. His vision is superb, and his handle is tight and slithery despite playing upright. He’s an elite decision-maker with an excellent feel for the game. This is the kind of player who thrives in today’s NBA, and he’s already played in an NBA-style scheme with NBA-level spacing at Illinois.

There aren’t many scenarios in which Wagler crashes out of the league and fails, because it’s hard to do so when you can shoot, pass and handle at this level. But to reach what I think is a serious chance at All-Star upside, Wagler needs to get stronger. He’s totally fearless on his drives and seems to have great basketball character. But he needs to get more physical to maintain the advantages he creates in ball screens and become a consistent on-ball threat. He’ll also need strength to defend more consistently than what he showed at Illinois this year. He knows where to be, but it’s going to take some time.

How Clippers fans reacted to the Keaton Wagler pickLaw Murray

This is the biggest surprise, pop-up one-and-done draft pick in the entire time I’ve been scouting. Wagler was elite this season at Illinois despite his lack of pedigree. He also led the No. 1 offense in the country. This is a potential All-Star guard if things break right with his physical development. He reminds me a lot of Austin Reaves stylistically, and he maybe even has more upside than that long term.

Hollinger’s analysis: I liked Kingston Flemings the best of this point guard pile-up between the fifth and (roughly) 10th picks, but Wagler’s ability to play off the ball next to Darius Garland likely makes him a better fit for what the Clippers hope will be their backcourt of the future, and the margin between Wagler and Flemings was relatively small to me. Grade: B+

6. Brooklyn Nets

Mikel Brown Jr. | 6-4 | 20 years old

Overall 10 Guard 6 Mikel Brown Jr. Louisville

A home-run hitter of a lead guard who could stand to settle for singles at times.

Read full profile ›

The pitch with Brown is simple. In today’s NBA, there might not be a more important intersection of skills than shooting and passing ability. Brown has those skills in a big way. He’s a monster 3-point shooter who hits them at volume, and he is a tremendous live-dribble passer who reads the court well and makes good decisions while also being able to separate in ball screens. With those two skills alone, it sets him up for a tremendous amount of success.

Brown needs to keep taking steps with his frame, however. On-ball players this skinny who have entered the NBA recently have struggled. The NBA is a man’s league. There’s no other way to put it. Brown is going to have to keep filling out now that he has grown to 6 feet 4. On one hand, I tend to be hard on smaller guards — and despite Brown’s height, he plays like a smaller guard. On the other hand, I tend to value skill, high IQ and shooting ability as much as anything. Brown possesses those skills in an immense quantity for such a young player.

He’s a polarizing prospect for scouts for a reason, and I go back and forth daily on what his future holds. Some days I see him as the best bet outside of the top five in the class, and other days, I’m not totally sure I see him as a winning NBA player.

Hollinger’s analysis: This feels like a bit of a reach, and the Nets’ recent draft history doesn’t inspire confidence that they know more than the wisdom of crowds on this one. Brown’s back issues at Louisville are also a concern, but the Nets have never shied away from a medical case and have frequently profited from this under Sean Marks. Grade: C+

7. Sacramento Kings

Darius Acuff Jr. | 6-2 | 19 years old

Overall 5 Guard 2 Darius Acuff Jr. Arkansas

The most polished teenage guard to enter the league in years; defense is the big question.

Read full profile ›

The conversation with Acuff is a difficult one. Undeniably, he’s going to be useful as an NBA player because he’s an excellent shot creator with physicality and the handle to separate from opponents. His shooting improved drastically this season, which allowed him to be efficient enough even despite his propensity for shots from the midrange. However, Acuff’s defense was quite poor, and the impact metrics overall back up the idea that his presence was often extremely harmful on that end of the court.

More than ever, smaller, ball-dominant guards are not seen as useful unless they are at the absolute apex of the league like Jalen Brunson. Acuff has a very narrow pathway toward success at the highest levels of the NBA. If you think he’s that good and has a lot of NBA All-Star equity, then you can reasonably have him in the lottery. But this profile feels like a better version of what Jeremiah Fears was last year, and the two are about the same age. Fears didn’t exactly show last season in New Orleans that he can be an impactful part of a winning team, with the Pelicans being one of the worst teams in the league and his presence tanking their lineup data when he’s on the court. We’ll see what happens with Acuff.

Hollinger’s analysis: I like Flemings better than Acuff, but Acuff has Damian Lillard-esque upside as an offensive player, and the Kings desperately need a guy like this at the controls, one who could potentially be a one-man offense if everything breaks right. I’d just like his odds of hitting better if it were any other organization that took him. Grade: B

8. Atlanta Hawks

Kingston Flemings | 6-3 | 19 years old

Overall 7 Guard 4 Kingston Flemings Houston

All-Star upside with lightning-quick first step; must improve his gathers and shooting.

Read full profile ›

I want to love Flemings, and I think there is undeniably All-Star upside if his development goes right. The intel on Flemings as a human being is strong, and he seems to have a full understanding of what his role will be at the next level, as well as what he needs to work on. He was productive and efficient offensively in what was not an ideal circumstance for his skill set as a driver and athlete at Houston this season. He was rightfully named an All-American as a freshman while playing for Kelvin Sampson, one of the toughest coaches in the country on young players. If you give him more space to operate like he will receive in the NBA, there’s a chance that he will flourish.

The key for Flemings to reach that upside is to improve his gathers, get stronger through his lower half and become an even better shooter. I love his passing and decision-making, as he comes up with creative angles. I love his ability to get into the midrange, which will be an essential counter. But he will need a floater game and will need to keep improving his footwork as he learns to play with more consistent slow steps and Euro steps. Defensively, too, his size will be an impediment, but he has a good enough frame to improve and avoid being a negative on that end.

This is an easy profile of a player to fall in love with. I would bet on Flemings making an All-Star Game at some point and being the kind of point guard teammates love playing with.

Hollinger’s analysis: The temptation to take big man Aday Mara had to be alluring, but Flemings is clearly the right pick. I liked him the best of any point guard in this draft, and the Hawks had a clear need for a true point guard in the wake of Trae Young’s departure last season. A nice reward for the Hawks after moving down 10 spots in the draft a year ago. Grade: A

9. Dallas Mavericks

Morez Johnson Jr. | 6-9 | 20 years old

Overall 11 Big 1 Morez Johnson Jr. Michigan

A versatile frontcourt defender who can roam the perimeter and destroy the glass.

Read full profile ›

I’m a big fan of the versatility Johnson brings defensively, and it’s hard for me to see how he doesn’t end up being a useful player on a winning NBA team. He allows a team to play multiple coverages on defense and can help a team have flexibility to go big or small, depending on the roster around him. If you want to kill the glass, you should play him at the four. If you want to go smaller and more mobile, he should be able to deal with most centers at the five.

Johnson could expand his value if the 3-point jumper comes along. If the Mavs could go five-out with Johnson at center, he would have a shot to close games in playoff situations. But the question is simply what kind of value Johnson will provide on offense, and if that will allow him to be more of a starting big or a third big. Even as a third big, I like the value proposition in the middle of the first round because I am willing to bet on Johnson’s character and toughness.

Hollinger’s analysis: Surprise! I’m a fan of Johnson but not quite at this level. I think his offensive limitations are a bit much to select him in the top 10 in such a strong draft. He also has some positional questions on this roster since the frontcourt is so loaded already. Shockingly, he goes ahead of his two Michigan teammates (Aday Mara and Lendeborg), both of whom most had rated higher throughout the draft cycle. Obviously, you wonder how much influence newly hired coach (and former Michigan head coach) Dusty May had on all this. Grade: C+

10. Milwaukee Bucks

Brayden Burries | 6-4 | 20 years old

Overall 8 Guard 5 Brayden Burries Arizona

An aggressive scoring guard who makes shots, attacks in transition and defends fiercely.

Read full profile ›

It’s hard for me to see how Burries won’t be a successful NBA player, at least in some regard. He’s a terrific two-way threat who can pressure the defense from all three levels as a scorer, thanks to his jumper and footwork. Defensively, he’s a hard-nosed, on-ball player who stays engaged off the ball and makes action plays happen with disruptive hands. I loved the way he fit into what Arizona did this season, not only as the team’s primary scoring threat but also as part of what made it a great defensive team.

Yet, I could understand if rebuilding teams aren’t wildly enthusiastic about Burries. He strikes me more as an elite complementary player than one who will turn into a star. I think he can average 20 points while playing high-level defense, but for him to turn into an All-Star, we’d need to see growth as a passer and playmaker, as well as development in his ability to create separation. He’d probably be successful at a place like Charlotte within Charles Lee’s offense. But in Milwaukee, without Giannis Antetokounmpo and asking him to be a primary player, I’m less enthusiastic and probably rank him more at the end of this tier of guards.

Hollinger’s analysis: I love this pick by the Bucks. In their position, you have to just get the best player available, and Burries was the last player left in my tier of quality guards before we got into the “everybody else” portion of the draft. His arrival could also be a signal that newly acquired Tyler Herro might not be a long-term guy in Milwaukee. Grade: A-

11. Golden State Warriors

Yaxel Lendeborg | 6-9 | 23 years old

Overall 9 Forward 3 Yaxel Lendeborg Michigan

Versatile two-way forward who is older but possesses elite tools and winning mindset.

Read full profile ›

There are some limitations with Lendeborg as a true creator, but it’s hard to find a player more ready-made to step into an NBA rotation. He’s a monster defender with legitimate plus-plus tools in terms of size and length at 6 feet 9 with a 7-foot-4 wingspan and the fluidity to slide his feet laterally. I would bet on him maxing out just below the level of All-Defensive, but I don’t think I can completely rule it out if he really decides he wants to be a stopper.

On offense, he has a very versatile skill set that should translate exceedingly well toward playing off other stars. I loved the way he slotted into the team concept this year at Michigan and didn’t make things about himself. At times, I’m not sure Lendeborg truly understands how complete his game is and how talented he is. But when it comes to slotting into a role in the NBA and playing off superstars, that’s not always a bad thing.

Yaxel Lendeborg is one of the best high-leverage role player bets in the 2026 NBA DraftSam Vecenie

There’s a chance he ends up peaking as a top 50 or so player in the league because of his two-way play. My idea here is basically, “What if you made Rui Hachimura a terrific defender who could also pass?” Or, what if Lendeborg is just a slight step below OG Anunoby? That’s an awesome player, and one whom every team is going to want, even if he’s almost 24 years old.

Hollinger’s analysis: I love this pick for the Warriors, and I suspect the Thunder front office (picking next) does not. Lendeborg is an older player, but he is a ready-made, Day 1 starter who can fill minutes at three positions and fits nicely on a team that is on a win-now trajectory. He doesn’t have the long-term upside of some other guys, but in terms of Year 1 impact, he may rival anyone in this draft. Grade: A-

12. Oklahoma City Thunder

Aday Mara | 7-3 | 21 years old

Overall 13 Big 3 Aday Mara Michigan

A special passer at 7-foot-3 who finishes efficiently and protects the rim.

Read full profile ›

Mara is a polarizing prospect because you have to play a very specific scheme and structure with him. You have to be willing to play in drop coverage, and to get the most out of him on offense, you need to be willing to lean into his special passing ability from the top of the court or on the block. But if you’re comfortable with playing such a style, Mara is a terrific get.

He’s a great finisher around the rim because of his touch and size. His passing ability is sublime, and his rim protection is exceedingly valuable. Yes, he needs to get in better shape and move his feet better so he can run out rotations and games. But it’s really hard to find bigs who are this multiskilled and have this type of basketball IQ. I have him as a late lottery pick, even with those flaws.

Yes, there will be matchups that can exploit him and potentially play him off the court. But by and large, Mara has the look of a starting NBA center with the floor of a backup if he doesn’t improve upon his weaknesses. Barring injury, it’s hard for me to see how he’s not at least a useful NBA player.

Hollinger’s analysis: Mara was the best player available, but he’s a curious fit on an Oklahoma City roster that already has two other accomplished centers (Isaiah Hartenstein and Chet Holmgren), a reliable backup in Jaylin Williams and just used a mid-first-round pick a year ago on center Thomas Sorber. This seemingly portends a trade somewhere down the line, but for now, the Thunder capitalized on a talent tier drop-off ahead of the next group of players. Grade: B

13. Milwaukee Bucks

Nate Ament | 6-10 | 19 years old

Overall 14 Forward 4 Nate Ament Tennessee

Can handle and pass at 6-10 but lacks strength and efficiency; upside is tantalizing.

Read full profile ›

This was not a great freshman season for Ament, and many scouts came away underwhelmed with his profile. I’m willing to hear the case that his environment at Tennessee was not ideal for his success, and that would be reasonable. It is genuinely impressive that he handled the kind of usage he was given on an Elite Eight team.

But a lot of Ament’s season had popped up in the past as skill-based concerns. The finishing has always been a concern. His handle has never been that creative. The jump shot has always needed work, even when it was falling as a senior in high school. He also plays very upright and is tall with high hips, meaning he can get moved around without being able to anchor to his spot.

Typically, I would be willing to fully sell Ament as a difference-maker in the NBA because this player archetype is just not my favorite. And yet, a lot of Ament’s profile reminds me of what Jaden McDaniels looked like coming out of Washington. McDaniels was more disruptive defensively, which is ultimately where he has made his bread and butter in the NBA. He’s also a twitchier athlete. But Ament covers ground similarly well thanks to his length and seems to care on that end. I ranked McDaniels 30th in 2020. That’s not far from where he was picked (No. 28), but it’s drastically lower than where he should have been picked. I’m probably going to end up lower on Ament than many scouts, but I can’t fully disregard this skill set and potential as a 3-and-D player.

Hollinger’s analysis: Another logical pick by the Bucks as they turn toward a rebuild. Ament was the highest player left on my board, and Milwaukee needs to be in the mode of talent-hoarding; the Bucks can worry about fit once they’re good enough for it to matter. The Bucks acquired this pick in the Giannis Antetokounmpo trade, which won’t complete until July 6, so the pick was announced as Miami’s. Grade: A-

14. Charlotte Hornets

Hannes Steinbach | 6-10 | 20 years old

Overall 12 Big 2 Hannes Steinbach Washington

Starting-caliber center with terrific hands, frame and footwork who will crash the glass.

Read full profile ›

I feel confident that Steinbach is going to be a long-term NBA player. Guys who are this big, skilled and coordinated, and this productive on the glass at a high level in Europe and in the United States collegiate system, are always going to stick around for a while. It’s ultimately about the role and how impactful he’ll be on winning games if he’s asked to do certain things.

Is he more of a third big man who can play both the four and the five if he can’t protect the rim well enough? Or can he develop enough on defense to become a starter who doesn’t take too much off the table, and who hurts the opposition with his finishing around the rim and offensive rebounding? With how important the possession battle is in today’s NBA and how important crashing the glass is on both ends, Steinbach is worth a first-round pick.

But there are very differing opinions on whether he can be a top-half-of-the-league starting center, more of a top-20 to -30 big man or a backup. I ended up with him in the back part of the lottery because there is safety that he’s going to stick for a long time. But even I’m not sure if he’s a top-20 center long term or more of a backup on a really good team.

Hollinger’s analysis: I had Steinbach a bit lower on my board, but Charlotte’s need for frontcourt help is undeniable, and Steinbach is an elite rebounder who can also add some stretch capability. I would have liked this choice a lot better with the Hornets’ second pick at No. 18, especially since Steinbach’s lack of rim protection and switchability likely limits his role somewhat, but this does check an important box. Grade: B-

This story will be updated.