‘National Emergency’: Trump cancels signing ceremony to light a fire for ‘desperately needed’ SAVE America Act * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

‘National Emergency’: Trump cancels signing ceremony to light a fire for ‘desperately needed’ SAVE America Act
By Bob Unruh

President Donald Trump is escalating the fight for election integrity in the United States.
Given the evidence of election fraud that has occurred in recent votes, he is demanding passage of the SAVE America Act, which would verify that only U.S. citizens are voting in national elections.
The plan has been the target of unjustified and inaccurate attacks from Democrats and other leftists who also have advocated, essentially, for open borders and open elections in America.
On Wednesday, Trump said on Truth Social: “Today’s Housing News Conference and Signing is hereby cancelled until such time as we pass the desperately needed SAVE AMERICA ACT, which I consider to be a National Emergency. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
A report at the Daily Signal said the U.S. House voted just hours earlier 358-32 for a housing package aimed “at lowering costs for homebuyers and increasing housing supply.”
The plan, called the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, earlier gained Senate approval 85-5.
But Trump is calling it a national emergency, and demanded the SAVE America plan, which would require proof of ID and citizenship to vote.
He explained the housing bill “pales in comparison” to the SAVE America Act.
“The Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren centric housing bill, which is of minor importance compared to lower interest rates, and even FISA, pales in comparison to passing THE SAVE AMERICA ACT,” he said. “That is what Americans, both Dumocrats, Republicans, and everyone else, care about.”
He continued, “Get the bad Republicans to approve it or, better yet, Terminate the Filibuster and approve it, AND EVERYTHING ELSE REPUBLICANS HAVE EVER DREAMED OF,” he added. “The Dumocrats will do it in hour one, 100%. Republicans will feel very stupid if they don’t do it first. I’ll be watching with tears in my eyes!!!”
He went on, “We have to pass the SAVE America Act, which is voter ID, which is proof of citizenship, etc. We have to pass it, so we’re going to have to talk about that, and many other things.”
Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, pointed out the housing plan contains “big government garbage & spending,” including a $200 million affordable housing pilot program to incentivize dense subsidized affordable housing units.
And another critic, Kevin Roberts, president of The Heritage Foundation, said, “Republicans must fight for BOTH” the SAVE America Act and a reconciliation bill including the president’s policy priorities.”
Giving up on the SAVE America Act isn’t an option.
Conservatives expect their elected leaders to FIGHT—and there’s no one better to deliver that message to Senate Republicans than President Trump himself.
Not only is the bill popular with voters, but it’s absolutely necessary. pic.twitter.com/IUr6CCijGd
— Rob Bluey (@RobertBluey) June 23, 2026
The Housing bill is full of big government garbage & spending. Yet the @HouseGOP is going to muscle it through with democrats tomorrow over conservative opposition. Just a few of its sins:
1. Rep Tlaib’s Sec. 207 (H.R. 6768), which is a $200 million affordable housing pilot…
— Chip Roy (@chiproytx) June 22, 2026
The American people are demanding that Congress deliver on two major priorities before the midterms: the SAVE America Act and Reconciliation 3.0. Show votes aren’t enough. Republicans must fight for BOTH.
The Senate must take up the SAVE America Act immediately and enforce the… https://t.co/QR8IcqTy5f
— Kevin Roberts (@KevinRobertsTX) June 24, 2026
![]()
Bob Unruh
Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is currently a news editor for the WND News Center, and also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. Read more of Bob Unruh's articles here.
Donald Trump, election integrity, SAVE America Act
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'