Most Concerning Development From Ravens Minicamp
Most Concerning Development From Ravens Minicamp
Forget what happened on the field - it doesn't matter. It's what the Ravens failed to accomplish from a contract standpoint that might sting the mostJason La Canfora|
In this story:
Baltimore RavensWe don’t get caught up in spring football.
Doesn’t matter who stood out. Doesn’t really matter who looked bad.
These are two-hand touch sessions that aren’t going to reveal much and they especially are not going to reveal much about a Ravens ream that has some of its biggest questions reserved for the offensive and defensive lines; trying to assess what’s going on in the trenches when they aren’t really playing football is impossible.
Forget about it.
No overreactions. No freaking out about OTAs and minicamps.
However, that doesn’t mean that the time spent on the field in May and June aren’t still potentially impactful times on the NFL calendar. That doesn’t mean that some teams aren’t accomplishing significant things from a roster standpoint, and the largest reality for the Ravens organization is that their best player and one of the best quarterbacks ever left Owings Mills with the same one-year, lame-duck contract he came to town with.
And that is a potentially massive problem.
Time Wasting For A New Deal
Execs around the league believe Lamar Jackson is far from guaranteed to be in Baltimore in 2027, and the more time that goes by without an extension and the closer we get to Week 1, the more the stakes raise for the Ravens. No one could argue that general manager Eric DeCosta has any sort of leverage at this point and Jackson being as “cool” as he said he was and seemed to be with making $52M this season and letting everything else take care of itself is the biggest problem of all.
DeCosta has grumbled some publicly and all the time privately about the difficulty they have getting Jackson, who represents himself, on the phone and enegged in contract talks. So when he’s in your building for weeks on end, and you get nowhere with him at this incredibly pivotal time, and then he’s back to traveling and going to Miami and then reporting for camp in football mode (which could mean no more contract talks), then he just might be running out the clock and checkmating this front office again.
When Patrick Mahomes resets the QB market for the third time in six years without anyone even asking about his future in Kansas City, then things get even trickier and pricier. If they didn’t want to give Jackson roughly $250M guaranteed prior to all of this, and they didn’t love $60M a season, then negotiating off of Mahomes now making $64M a year from 2027 on isn’t going to help their cause.
Jackson didn’t want to talk about the contract, and he doesn’t have to. He doesn’t have to do anything at all except sign the right piece of paper, eventually, with the right numbers on it. Whether that’s presented by DeCosta or someone else.
He was patient and adroit at getting most of what he wanted last time around, and he has far greater wealth now than before and he also has a no trade and no tag provision, hammers he did not wield last time around when he demanded a trade before finally putting pen to paper in Baltimore.
The Ravens missed an essential window a year ago when Josh Allen got his long-term extension. DeCosta sloughed it off at the time and said he would have much more work to do the following offseason. Well, training camp is coming fast and this offseason is getting thin, and the best time to get an audience with Jackson – especially in person – ended last week without any major developments.
Might end up being the first loss of the 2026 season.
Subscribe On YouTube For The Best Ravens Coverage:
Published Jun 18, 2026
JASON LA CANFORAJason has covered sports professionally for newspapers, websites and broadcast networks since 1996 and have covered the NFL extensively for The Washington Post, CBS Sports and The NFL Network from 2004-2025.
Follow JasonLaCanforaHome/News
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'
Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
Venezuela Fury and Noah Price subsidising their life by livestreaming
Venezuela Fury and her husband Noah Price look to be making their own way in the world by raking it in from their lucrative social media accounts.
The influencer daughter of Tyson and Paris Fury, 16, has become an internet sensation after tying the knot with her husband Noah, 19, earlier this year.
Since getting married and moving in together the couple have been earning thousands of pounds a month, livestreaming their life as newlyweds in their static caravan in the East Riding of Yorkshire.
And fans can't get enough of their regular life updates on TikTok and Kick, which have proved to be very profitable for the pair.
They look to be supporting themselves after Noah denied that he was given £5million by Venezuela's family as a wedding gift.
Despite his wife's huge family wealth, an estimated combined £160 million, Noah recently told his Kick followers that he 'pays for everything' for the couple.
Making light of the claims about Venezuela's millionaire financial status, Noah said: 'I actually pay for everything unfortunately. You'd expect the millionaire to pay for it wouldn't you.'
Venezuela Fury and Noah Price are earning thousands livestreaming their caravan life - after her new groom insisted he pays all the bills and denied he had £5m handout from her dad
The influencer daughter of Tyson and Paris Fury , 16, has become an internet sensation after tying the knot with her husband Noah, 19, earlier this year
Venezuela then asked their fans: 'Do you think I am a millionaire?'
Noah joked: 'She isn't a secret millionaire guys', before she broke into song and sang: 'But I live like a millionaire!'
But it seems according to estimated calculations from their social media work, Noah and Venezuela can more than afford to support themselves.
Noah has been livestreaming on platforms such as Kick and TikTok, where viewers can send paid gifts or donations.
He was previously encouraging viewers to send gifts on his honeymoon during livestreams, suggesting this is one revenue stream.
Both Noah and Venezuela have built substantial followings on Instagram and TikTok. They can potentially earn money through sponsored posts, brand collaborations, affiliate links and creator payouts.
Kick allows its creators to take home 95 per cent of the £4.99 subscription cost that fans pay.
Streamers keep 100 per cent of direct tips and donations, minus minor standard payment processing fees.
It is unclear how many subscribers Noah currently has because this information is hidden, but he does have 7,200 followers which is publicly viewable.
An industry insider has suggested Noah is making around £400 per video on TikTok, while Venezuela is likely to make £2,000 due to her following count of 1.3 million.
An industry insider has suggested Noah is making around £400 per video on TikTok, while Venezuela is likely to make £2,000 due to her following count of 1.3 million
In one video on their honeymoon, Noah asked his followers if they'd give them some more gifts now that they were married.
In a TikTok live viewed by 20,000 he said: 'Keep liking our videos people, keep sending gifts.'
After saying thank you to several of his followers he joked they should stick around on the livestream and 'watch Venezuela punch me in the mouth'.
The other half of the honeymooning couple said: 'I am, honestly!'
Noah previously confirmed that the pair don't share their finances after they were asked whether they have a shared bank account.
'She earns her money, I earn mine,' said Noah, as Venezuela joked: 'Yeah, what you gonna do about it.'
Noah went on to debunk the rumour that Tyson gave him £5million when he tied the knot with his daughter as he insisted: 'No Tyson did not give me £5million'.
Meanwhile Venezuela is being eyed up by executives for a fly on the wall TV series.
Noah went on to debunk the rumour that Tyson gave him £5million when he tied the knot with his daughter as he insisted: 'No Tyson did not give me £5million'
Boasting 1.3 million TikTok followers, Venezuela is already entertaining fans with her honest musings and candid moments, from cooking to kitting out her and Noah's static caravan home.
And following the success of the Netflix series At Home With The Furys, it is no wonder bosses are wanting to draw on the Fury popularity.
A TV insider said: 'The couple are not A-list celebrities but everyone has become obsessed with their love story.
'People are genuinely intrigued by them. Whether it’s the fact they have married so young, Venezuela’s famous family or their gypsy lifestyle, they have the ‘X factor'.
'Several TV executives think a proper fly-on-the-wall series following their lives as newlyweds in the gypsy community would be fascinating,' they told The Sun.
It is thought Netflix would be likely to produce the series due to their already established relationship with the Furys.
Venezuela's representatives told The Daily Mail: 'We have many offers on the table regarding Venezuela which we are discussing.'
