Liverpool should consider move to re-sign former forward – Opinion
Story by
Could Darwin Núñez Be About to Complete an Anfield Return?
Rumours continue to circulate that Darwin Núñez is waiting until Uruguay’s World Cup campaign concludes before deciding on his future.
Some reports suggest the striker could return to Liverpool on either a free transfer or a season-long loan agreement containing an option to buy. Others insist there is no truth whatsoever to the speculation.
AdvertisementAdvertisementAs things stand, Liverpool supporters are left in a familiar position.
Waiting. Waiting for clarity. Waiting for facts. Waiting to discover whether one of the most divisive figures of the modern Liverpool era could somehow find his way back to Anfield.
Personally, I believe it is an option worth exploring.
The reality facing Liverpool is that Hugo Ekitike is expected to miss the overwhelming majority of the upcoming campaign through injury. That immediately creates a problem within the squad’s attacking structure.
Alexander Isak may be one of the finest forwards in world football, but no elite club can expect one striker to carry the burden across four competitions.
AdvertisementAdvertisementDepth is essential.
Experience is essential.
Numbers are essential.
Darwin would provide all three.
The Uruguayan never lacked commitment during his first spell on Merseyside. He never hid from pressure, never stopped running, and never lacked the desire to improve. While his finishing could often frustrate supporters, his willingness to work for the team was never in question.
That matters.
Particularly under Andoni Iraola.
The new Liverpool head coach demands relentless effort, aggressive pressing and physical intensity from his attackers. Those requirements align perfectly with Darwin’s natural strengths.
AdvertisementAdvertisementIn many ways, the style Iraola wants to implement appears far better suited to Darwin than the football Liverpool played under Arne Slot.
An Opportunistic Signing Michael Edwards Would Normally Love
There will undoubtedly be supporters who oppose the idea.
That is understandable.
Darwin’s previous Liverpool career produced moments of brilliance, moments of chaos and moments of immense frustration. His record remains a subject of debate among supporters and probably always will.
However, context matters.
His spell in Saudi Arabia has not gone entirely to plan, but there are reasons for that. The arrival of Karim Benzema significantly altered the attacking hierarchy at his club and reduced opportunities for consistent minutes. Any striker thrives on rhythm and continuity, and Darwin has rarely been afforded either over the past twelve months.
AdvertisementAdvertisementWhat remains unchanged are his physical attributes.
His pace is elite.
His strength remains exceptional.
His movement continues to cause defenders problems.
Most importantly, he would return with something to prove.
Footballers often produce their best work when driven by doubt.
Darwin would arrive carrying plenty of motivation.
Liverpool also needs to consider the wider picture.
Both wings require strengthening. Midfield reinforcements are needed. Centre-back depth remains a concern. Significant resources will be required across multiple areas of the squad.
That is why a low-cost move for Darwin becomes increasingly attractive.
AdvertisementAdvertisementThis is exactly the type of opportunistic deal that Michael Edwards built his reputation upon during Liverpool’s most successful modern period. Acquiring a player with proven Premier League experience, existing connections to the club and a desire to prove people wrong without committing huge transfer funds could represent smart business.
Whether the rumours prove true remains to be seen.
Liverpool supporters should certainly remain cautious until something concrete emerges.
But if Darwin Núñez genuinely becomes available on favourable terms, then Liverpool should not dismiss the possibility.
The club is entering a new era under Iraola.
AdvertisementAdvertisementUnexpected opportunities can sometimes become the smartest decisions.
And Darwin’s unfinished business with Liverpool may yet have another chapter to be written.
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'
Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
