How one new telescope is going to change astronomy forever

In a dark Nevada valley, a new eye is opening on the cosmos. Before the decade is out, the Deep Synoptic Array (DSA)—1,650 20-foot diameter dish-shaped antennas spread over just more than 120 square miles of desert—should begin soaking up radio waves from across the sky. The DSA will combine unprecedented sensitivity and power to try answering some of astronomers’ biggest questions about how galaxies form and grow.
The DSA just reached its final design milestone and will soon begin construction, with completion targeted for 2029. The project is led by the California Institute of Technology and bankrolled by Schmidt Sciences, a splashy new philanthropic venture poised to shake the pillars of U.S astrophysics, where advances are often more sedate—and government funding is the norm.
“The DSA is going to have, by far, the best combination of both sensitivity—seeing far—and sky coverage—seeing wide,” says Maura McLaughlin, an astronomer at West Virginia University, who is part of the telescope’s Science Advisory Committee. “It's a very different way of doing radio astronomy.”
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
That difference comes from how the DSA will combine signals from its many sensitivity-boosting dishes. Radio arrays typically must save the raw feeds from each antenna for subsequent processing, requiring enormous computational and data storage resources. Data from the DSA’s combined 1,650 dishes, for instance, would churn out as much data as all U.S. Internet traffic. The project will avoid that deluge by instead combining and processing the signals in real time, automatically tossing out much of the raw data to rapidly produce crisp images.
“It’s beautifully designed, and it’s pioneering this new way to build telescopes,” says astronomer Dan Werthimer, who is not directly involved with the DSA. “It’s the future of radio astronomy.”
This “radio camera” approach should allow the DSA to survey the sky 100 times faster than any other radio observatory and is built on a mix of state-of-the-art and mundane innovations. In addition to the most powerful graphics processing units (GPUs) on the planet—NVIDIA’s next-generation Vera Rubin GPUs—the DSA will rely on thousands of modified household cake pans, purchased on the cheap from the bakeware-manufacturing company Fat Daddio.
“Why go and pay for some custom design when there’s a company that’s figured out how to make these things at very low cost?” says Gregg Hallinan, an astronomer at Caltech and one of the DSA’s principal investigators, who adds how “amazing” a scientific collaborator Fat Daddio has been. “They’re excited to be involved.”
Several astrophysical mysteries sit in the radio band of wavelengths. For decades, observatories have recorded brief-but-bright flashes of radio waves—fast radio bursts, or FRBs—whose origin on the sky astronomers have managed to pinpoint in only a handful of cases. The DSA will observe and hopefully localize tens of thousands of FRBs. Hopefully, this will help determine whether they’re sparked by an eruption from a single neutron star, or when two of these tiny but massive bodies collide.
The DSA will also carefully track rapidly spinning neutron stars called pulsars across the whole sky. Pulsars beam light outward as they spin, hitting us at regular intervals like a cosmic lighthouse. In 2023 a collaboration of radio astronomers reported tiny deviations in the timing of these flashes from dozens of pulsars in the Milky Way. They think the effect might be due to giant gravitational waves—ripples in spacetime between the astral lighthouses and us. The DSA will help decide whether the signal is real, and what exotic cataclysm is causing it. This could be orbiting pairs of supermassive black holes, or even cosmic strings or echoes from our universe’s early period of rapid inflation.
Beyond these big questions, the DSA will also trace the step-by-step formation of stars in young galaxies, and observe energetic outbursts from gluttonous black holes. Most excitingly for astronomy as a whole, it will also synergize with other observatories to rapidly hunt down radio counterparts for any conspicuous things going “bump” in the cosmic night. It might even find “technosignatures” of advanced alien civilizations—presuming they, too, are blasting radio waves out from their own planetary systems, just as we are with our homegrown technology.
“DSA will really open up the sky in a ridiculous way,” says Katie Jameson, the observatory’s project manager.
“The most transformative observatories are not defined by a single science goal,” says Arpita Roy, director of Schmidt Sciences’ Astrophysics and Space Center. “They create entirely new ways of seeing the universe.”
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,
David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American
SubscribeBadenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'