Frozen funds will never ‘touch Iran’ under Trump-backed MOU, US official tells The Post
Frozen funds will never 'touch Iran' under Trump-backed MOU, US official tells The Post
- US News
- World News
- Page Six
- Sports
- Post Sports+
- Sports Betting
- Business
- Opinion
- Entertainment
- Shopping
- Lifestyle
- Health
- Real Estate
- Alexa
- Media
- Tech
- Science
- Astrology
- Video
- Photos
- Pod Force One
- NY POSTcast
Switch between CA and NY editions here.
Editiontrending now in World News
Skip to main content
American boy, 12, attacked by shark while swimming at Bahamas...
Venezuela rocked by strongest earthquakes in over a century,...
At least 17 people injured after driver plows into Mexican soccer...
Netherlands euthanizes child under 12 in first case since major...
Mom, who lost arm in horrific shark attack, wakes up from...
Frightening moment powerful 7.2 earthquake rocks Venezuelan...
Frightened travelers flee Venezuela’s crumbling airport...
US promises ‘big, fast, and effective’ assistance for...
World News
Frozen funds will never ‘touch Iran’ under Trump-backed MOU, US official tells The Post
By Caitlin Doornbos Published June 25, 2026, 10:28 a.m. ETSee more of our coverage in your search results.
Add The New York Post on GoogleThe Trump administration is insisting that billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets will never actually reach Tehran’s hands, pushing back on criticism that the White House is preparing to bankroll one of America’s most dangerous adversaries.
“None of this money is ever going to touch Iran,” a senior US official told The Post.
Instead, officials say, the funds would function more like an escrow account, with payments sent directly to approved vendors supplying humanitarian goods rather than to the Iranian regime itself.
3
“There’s no big handouts, there’s no big tranches of cash,” the person said.
Under the arrangement tied to ongoing US-Iran negotiations, Tehran can request purchases of items such as food, medicine and other humanitarian supplies, but would never directly receive the money.
That means payments will go directly to companies supplying agricultural products, medical equipment or other approved goods.
Explore More
American boy, 12, attacked by shark while swimming at Bahamas resort
Venezuela rocked by strongest earthquakes in over a century, fears up to 100K deaths — Trump vows US ‘ready, willing and able to help’
At least 17 people injured after driver plows into Mexican soccer fans celebrating World Cup win
The humanitarian spending would come from a Qatar-held $6 billion fund released by former President Joe Biden as part of a September 2023 prisoner swap that brought home five detained Iranian-Americans, in exchange for five Iranians held by the US, officials have previously told The Post.
It comes after Iranian media this week suggested Tehran would be given $12 billion in two tranches.
The US argues the arrangement gives Washington complete control over the pace and scope of any economic relief while ensuring Iran receives incentives to continue cooperating with nuclear inspections and other provisions being negotiated.
The system ensures the money never enters Iranian government accounts and can be shut off immediately if talks collapse.
“Every single piece of this process, we retain control,” the official said. “If at some point in the process the Iranians stop walking this path with us, payments stop. We can freeze the whole thing.”
3
The $6 billion originated from Iranian oil sales years ago to South Korea, which the Biden administration in 2023 allowed to be transferred to Qatar for use on humanitarian goods. While the funds were moved to Doha, Washington put a hold on payouts to Tehran after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas massacre in Israel.
That money is entirely separate from the estimated $10 billion Tehran could make through oil sales over a 60-day period of waived oil sanctions the US granted as part of the MOU, which also removed the American blockade of Iranian ports.
US officials have downplayed the sanctions waiver, noting that Iran was already selling oil on the black market despite the American sanctions.
Still, experts say the move has made it far easier for Tehran to make cash quickly — as it also allows the Islamic Republic access to legitimate banking networks.
“There is a world of difference between doing what you can to stop the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism from getting more dollars, to turning a blind eye to literally enabling it,” Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior Iran program director of the Foundation for Defending Democracies, told The Post.
It also does not include the $300 billion in reconstruction investments in Iran that the US has pledged to round up from private companies in the Gulf and across the world should Tehran agree to a final deal with Washington at the end of the negotiation period.
3
The official also emphasized that any funds released would come in small increments tied to specific humanitarian transactions outside the country — without money touching Iran — rather than large cash transfers.
Officials argue the structure is designed to address humanitarian needs inside Iran while preventing the regime from diverting money to military activities, proxy groups or its nuclear program.
The arrangement remains one of the most politically sensitive pieces of the broader negotiations, with critics warning that any sanctions relief could ultimately strengthen Tehran.
Critics say any amount spent on Tehran could be problematic, as money is fungible and can free up other funds for illicit activities.
“We just got out of two direct conventional conflicts and a blockade with this regime, so anything that relieves the pressure frees up more revenue and more resources to build back better,” Taleblu said.
However, the MOU forbids Iran from supporting terrorism, and the administration has said frozen funds can be cut off if such behavior is detected.
Filed under Read Next US promises 'big, fast, and effective' assistance for Vene...Trending Now in World News
-
This story has been shared 30,500 times.
30,500
American boy, 12, attacked by shark while swimming at Bahamas resort
-
This story has been shared 25,872 times.
25,872
Venezuela rocked by strongest earthquakes in over a century, fears up to 100K deaths — Trump vows US ‘ready, willing and able to help’
-
This story has been shared 6,989 times.
6,989
At least 17 people injured after driver plows into Mexican soccer fans celebrating World Cup win
-
This story has been shared 6,207 times.
6,207
Netherlands euthanizes child under 12 in first case since major law change
Listen Now
Now on Page Six
-
Finally, a good look at Zoë Kravitz’s massive engagement ring worth half a million dollars
-
‘Cars’ singer Gary Numan confesses how he wooed fan-turned-wife may ‘be illegal now’
Video
More Stories
Page Six
Lionel Richie, 77, falls ill onstage, abruptly ends opening night concert in Minnesota
Decider
Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Oasis’ On Netflix, Where A Young Woman’s Disappearance Puts A Luxury Resort On Lockdown
NYPost
LaMelo Ball traded away by Hornets in stunning NBA bombshell
© 2026 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of Use Subscription Terms Privacy Notice SitemapYour California Privacy Rights
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'
Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
