katero
Jun 23, 2026

Former IRS officials call for judge to scrutinize Trump's 'breathtakingly improper' immunity from audits

Former IRS officials call for judge to scrutinize Trump's 'breathtakingly improper' immunity from audits

A judge is probing whether a recent settlement was a "fraud on the court."

ByPeter CharalambousJune 23, 2026, 12:20 AM

    A group of former officials with the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice is asking a federal judge to scrutinize a controversial deal that granted President Donald Trump and his family sweeping immunity from past tax audits. 

    They alleged that the deal to resolve Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax documents in exchange for immunity from past audits was "unprecedented and breathtakingly improper."

    U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams reopened the case last month after a group of 35 former federal judges alleged that the settlement -- which included both the immunity and the DOJ's now-scuttled $1.8 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" -- was deceptive and a "fraud on the court."

    RelatedDems demand answers from Treasury secretary on Trump's IRS settlement

    In an amicus brief filed Monday, the former officials argued that the audit provision was unlawful and should be scrutinized.

    "The President of the United States is obligated to pay taxes he owes, just like every other American. If the Immunity Order is allowed to stand, it will enshrine two separate tax codes, one for President Trump, his family, and his 'affiliates,' and another for every other American," the group of former officials wrote. "It opens the door for President Trump and future presidents to avoid scrutiny of their taxes while in office and absolve themselves and favored individuals of wrongdoing"

    Other posts