Exclusive | Will King Charles have to meet with Meghan Markle in order to see beloved grandchildren on UK visit? Insiders weigh in
Exclusive | Will King Charles meet with Meghan Markle during UK visit?
- News
- Entertainment
- Page Six Hollywood
- Page Swift
- TV
- Virtual Reali-Tea
- Movies
- Music
- Awards
- Sports
- Lifestyle
- Travel
- Real Estate
- Page Six Style
- Fashion
- Beauty
- Shopping
- Royal Family
- Parents
- Society
Recommended
Skip to main contentSHOP NOW
Shop Prime Day like a star with deals on A-list beauty favorites: Crest, Charlotte Tilbury and more Royal Family exclusiveWill King Charles have to meet with Meghan Markle in order to see beloved grandchildren on UK visit? Insiders weigh in
By Sara Nathan Published June 19, 2026, 6:00 a.m. ETSee more of our coverage in your search results.
Add Page Six on GoogleAs Prince Harry reportedly prepares to bring his family back to his homeland, in part to see his father, one big question swirls: Will Meghan Markle meet up with the royals she has publicly scorned?
Royal experts told Page Six that ever “diplomatic” King Charles would be willing to see Meghan Markle and would never shun her.
However, any meet-up will certainly be kept under wraps, with no photographers.
As we reported, Prince Harry is getting his wish of bringing Markle and their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, back to the UK next month for the first time in four years.
5
The Sussexes are traveling from California for a week of “Year to Go” events in anticipation of the 2027 Invictus Games in Birmingham. Their security is believed to have been upgraded after Harry’s fierce row with the British government over his bid to have armed police protect him in the UK.
Explore More
Why Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s children won’t reunite with royal cousins during UK visit
How Prince Harry’s Charles reunion will impact William relationship after ‘unforgivable betrayal’
Princess Charlotte, 11, looks all grown up in new Father’s Day photo with dad Prince William
Sources on both sides say there is no doubt Charles, 77, is eager to spend time with his grandchildren, having only seen Archie, 7, in person a handful of times and Lilibet, 5, just once.
“I am sure he will see the children,” said Hugo Vickers, royal biographer and friend of the family. “The king has always left the door wide open, and he did see Harry last September.
“It’s a good idea that Harry should reconcile privately with his father, for both their sakes. The king made it clear that he didn’t want his last years to be miserable, and Harry is burdened with enough trauma that, if Charles died without them making peace, that would just cause him even more problems,” Vickers added.
5
“This is a good thing for both sides.”
Charles has been open about his cancer battle, prompting Harry, who believed his father could override the government on the security battle, to tell the BBC in May 2025, “I would love reconciliation with my family. Life is precious. I don’t know how much longer my father has, he won’t speak to me because of this security stuff. It would be nice to reconcile.”
Charles has a close relationship with Prince William and Kate Middleton’s children, Prince George, 12, Princess Charlotte, 11, and Prince Louis, 8, as evidenced when they joined him on the balcony at Buckingham Palace this past weekend for the Trooping the Colour ceremony.
5
Although Markle, 44, has railed against the royal family and claimed she suffered abuse and racism while living within palace walls, going as far as to detail how she suffered suicidal thoughts, Vickers said Charles is eternally “diplomatic.”
Despite the drama of the past few years, Vickers said, “It would only make matters worse if the king refused to see her.”
We’ve learned that Charles still plans to make his annual pilgrimage to Edinburgh, Scotland, for a tradition known as Holyrood Week, which traditionally takes place every year from late June to early July.
5
The king stays at the Palace of Holyroodhouse, the monarch’s official Scottish residence — and never changes his schedule as “he’s a busy man,” said Vickers.
But the timing means he should be available to meet Harry and his family, as the Invictus event is slated for July 10-17.
Another palace source, however, fears that Charles will be dragged along into the Sussex spotlight and the chaos that follows them, saying: “Harry and Meghan will frame it as the royal family need them, and Charles needs them.”
5
The last time the Sussexes were all together in the UK was for the late Queen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee in July 2022, just two months before she died. Harry and Markle brought baby Lilibet, who was given the queen’s childhood nickname, to meet her great-grandmother at Windsor Castle.
However, while they asked to bring their own photographer, the queen and her staff refused.
As we reported, Harry is not likely to see his older brother William amid their now years-long estrangement.
Page Six has reached out to Sussex reps and Buckingham Palace for comment.
Filed under- archie harrison mountbatten-windsor
- King Charles III
- lilibet diana mountbatten-windsor
- meghan markle
- prince harry
- 6/19/26
Popular Shopping
-
Jennifer Lawrence’s $890 jelly shoes aren’t on sale — but these Prime Day finds are
-
Taylor Swift and our social media manager have this ‘game-changer’ hair care in common, and it’s 30% off
-
Anne Hathaway calls this anti-aging cream ‘the best’ — and it’s on sale for its lowest price ever
-
The best celeb-approved Prime Day fashion deals — Levi’s to Free People
-
Hailey Bieber and Kylie Jenner’s glass-skin wand is $150 for Prime Day: ‘Iron out fine lines and wrinkles’
Trending Now
-
This story has been shared 61,589 times.
61,589
Dianna Russini’s reported huge NYT salary before she lost job over Mike Vrabel photo scandal revealed
-
This story has been shared 22,211 times.
22,211
Melissa Gilbert moves out of NYC apartment in wake of husband Timothy Busfield’s child sex abuse case
-
This story has been shared 18,155 times.
18,155
Dianna Russini addresses Mike Vrabel scandal in texts with NYT reporter: ‘Significant impact on my life’
-
This story has been shared 15,522 times.
15,522
Joe Manganiello reveals life-threatening health battle resulting in ‘amputation’
Now on Decider
-
‘Jersey Shore’ Star Angelina Pivarnick Reveals Miscarriage “Almost Killed” Her: “It’s Still Tough To This Day”
Latest: Page Six Style
-
Zendaya’s ‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’ press tour looks are black, white and red all over
-
Jennifer Lawrence’s $890 jelly shoes aren’t on sale — but these Prime Day finds are
-
Connor Storrie sweats out Paris’ hottest day ever in PVC boots and a see-through trench
-
Kendall Jenner and Jacob Elordi coordinate in style during Australia getaway
-
Taylor Swift and our social media manager have this ‘game-changer’ hair care in common, and it’s 30% off
More Stories
Page Six
Dianna Russini’s reported huge NYT salary before she lost job over Mike Vrabel photo scandal revealed
Decider
Stream It Or Skip It: 'Oasis' On Netflix, Where A Young Woman's Disappearance Puts A Luxury Resort On Lockdown
NYPost
Exclusive | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street — then stole it — is fired from JPMorgan Chase, was DEI exec
© 2026 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms Of Use Privacy Notice SitemapYour California Privacy Rights
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
