Exclusive | Prince Harry, Meghan Markle will bring their own security to UK: ‘Want to make the biggest spectacle’
Exclusive | Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, bringing own security to the UK
- News
- Entertainment
- Page Six Hollywood
- Page Swift
- TV
- Virtual Reali-Tea
- Movies
- Music
- Awards
- Sports
- Lifestyle
- Travel
- Real Estate
- Page Six Style
- Fashion
- Beauty
- Shopping
- Royal Family
- Parents
- Society
Recommended
Skip to main content Royal Family exclusivePrince Harry, Meghan Markle will bring their own security to UK: ‘Want to make the biggest spectacle’
By Sara Nathan Published June 25, 2026, 4:10 p.m. ETSee more of our coverage in your search results.
Add Page Six on GooglePrince Harry is expected to bring his own security team with his family visits London next month, as sources said the renegade royal and wife Meghan Markle are preparing for a “huge spectacle.”
Harry — who pays about $3 million a year for private security in the US — has yet to be afforded VIP security after battling the British Home Office for 24/7 armed police escorts, and is in a “holding pattern,” we’re told.
But he has been offered a royal residence with private security for his stay with Markle and their kids Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5.
7
One source in the know said the family won’t fly by private jet, but they will have their own bodyguards, adding, “Harry always travels with one of two of his own security team.”
The family’s first time back to the UK in four years is expected to draw a huge amount of attention.
Explore More
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle and kids may scrap UK visit after being denied taxpayer-funded security
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry and kids vacation in Europe as family trip to UK remains up in the air
Prince George, 12, nearly towers over mom Kate Middleton during rare joint outing
The Sussexes’ trip has been planned to mark the one-year countdown until the Invictus Games takes place in Birmingham next summer, from July 7-10, and Harry wants to use the time to reunite with his father, King Charles, who has barely seen Archie and Lilibet.
“They know it will make the biggest spectacle,” said the source of Harry and Markle. “They will want photos of them being ‘royal.'”
Indeed, the big question is whether the Sussexes, in tandem with Buckingham Palace, will release a photo of Charles with his grandchildren.
7
7
7
Although the children have been heavily featured on Markle’s Instagram account — and in ads for her lifestyle range, As Ever — they have rarely had their full faces pictured.
Harry’s UK security is a matter for RAVEC, the Royal and VIP Executive Committee, which is responsible for deciding the level of security granted to senior royals and other VIPs in the UK.
But the family’s own security are not allowed to carry weapons in the UK; only elite officers are allowed to be armed.
7
Harry and his team also don’t get MI6 or police intelligence, as sources said that royal and diplomatic protection cops are tapped into the intelligence infrastructure of the state in a way that private security are not.
Back in January, when Harry was London’s High Court for his privacy case against the publisher of the Daily Mail, a known stalker, who may be suffering from mental health issues, sat just feet away from him on two separate occasions, according to The Daily Telegraph.
The prince’s private security team noticed the stalker in court, but did not have have the right to intervene.
7
“There is nothing they could do; they are not the police. It’s a public building, and she has a right to be there,” an insider said.
Sir Clive Alderton, King Charles’ Principal Private Secretary — and the most senior aide at Buckingham Palace — is one of eight on the panel who holds Harry’s security in his hands.
Harry has long argued that his father could step in and override any decision made by RAVEC, telling the BBC last year, “There is a lot of control and ability in my father’s hands.
Want more celebrity and pop culture news?
Start your day with Page Six Daily.
Thanks for signing up!
“Ultimately, this whole thing could be resolved through him. Not necessarily by intervening, but by stepping aside, allowing the experts to do what is necessary,” he added.
“I can’t see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the UK at this point … And I think that it’s really quite sad that I won’t be able to show, you know, my children my homeland.”
7
Last year, he was granted a risk-management board to review his security status. Now RAVEC is set to advise an independent chair to weigh in on whether Harry should be entitled to armed guards.
In a statement, the Home Office told Page Six, “The UK Government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”
And while Markle, 44, took the opportunity to publicize her As Ever brand while on an April trip to Australia, including partnering with the AI fashion platform OneOff, we’re told she has no plans to hold any work meetings while in the UK.
A Sussex rep declined to discuss security issues.
Filed under- archie harrison mountbatten-windsor
- kate middleton
- King Charles III
- lilibet diana mountbatten-windsor
- meghan markle
- prince harry
- prince william
- 6/25/26
Popular Shopping
-
The Oura Ring 4 fitness tracker stars love is still at its lowest price ever — but not for long
-
Kyle Richards said these on-sale face masks make her skin ‘look like glass’
-
Jennifer Lawrence paired an Hermès handbag with these iconic under-$30 slides she wears on repeat
-
Celebrity fashion on an Amazon budget: Last-minute Prime Day deals starting under $8
-
Kim Kardashian just dropped her core routine for a ‘snatched neck’ and ‘that glow’
Trending Now
-
This story has been shared 25,994 times.
25,994
‘RHONJ’ star Teresa Giudice’s daughter Milania, 20, breaks silence on shocking assault arrest
-
This story has been shared 24,091 times.
24,091
Collin Gosselin sends pointed message to mom Kate with savage post ahead of memoir release
-
This story has been shared 15,675 times.
15,675
Director faces decade-plus in prison for bilking Netflix out of $11M — as pal Keanu Reeves begs for leniency
-
This story has been shared 14,540 times.
14,540
The veteran actor who played Danny Tanner in original unaired ‘Full House’ pilot unearthed
Now on Decider
See AllLatest: Page Six Style
-
Megan Thee Stallion is the ultimate ‘Love Island’ bombshell in a jaw-dropping beaded thong bodysuit
-
BET Awards 2026 red carpet: Lizzo, Doechii and more celebrity looks
-
Holly Madison reveals the plastic surgery she’s ‘happy’ she got after her pregnancy
-
North West, 13, shows off new lip piercings during Paris Fashion Week
-
The Oura Ring 4 fitness tracker stars love is still at its lowest price ever — but not for long
More Stories
Page Six
‘RHONJ’ star Teresa Giudice’s daughter Milania, 20, breaks silence on shocking assault arrest
Decider
Stream It Or Skip It: 'Agent Kim Reactivated' On Netflix, Where A Mild-Mannered Office Worker Dregs Up His Black Ops Past When His Daughter Goes Missing
NYPost
Sickening footage shows Texas sisters Cookie and Kitty grin as they're busted for allegedly hacking mom of 5 to death
© 2026 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms Of Use Privacy Notice SitemapYour California Privacy Rights
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
