Early prototype of Stonehenge unearthed 3 miles from prehistoric landmark
LONDON — It’s just a stone’s throw away, but archaeologists have discovered an earlier and simpler version of Britain’s iconic Stonehenge that predates the ancient landmark by around 500 years.
Researchers uncovered two large pits that they believe once held towering wooden posts in the village of Bulford 3 miles to the east of Stonehenge in southern England, according to a news release from Wessex Archaeology, whose team made the discovery.
“Up till now, our knowledge of this ancient feat of astronomy was based on Stonehenge and other monuments of a similar period,” Phil Harding, who led the excavation, said in the news release Thursday. “But what we’ve discovered at Bulford is 500 years earlier than the famous stones we know so well.”
While the timber has long since rotted away, the posts lined up to point directly at the rising sun during the summer solstice and the setting sun at the winter solstice — in the same way as Stonehenge.
In an interview with NBC News, Harding said he was “ecstatic, but cautious,” as the team had to be “absolutely certain” their interpretations were correct.
Researchers also uncovered pottery, flint tools and animal bones at the site, suggesting it may have been a focal point for ceremonies and gatherings.
“The ancient people had quite a sophisticated knowledge about the sky, and the movements of the moon and the sun,” said Jennifer Wexler, curator of history at English Heritage, a charity that manages Stonehenge and around 400 other historic sites across England.
“But they had religious ideas about it too,” she said in a telephone interview Thursday.
Although the excavation took place between 2015 and 2017, archaeologists spent years analyzing the artifacts before concluding that the site dates to around 3000 B.C., when Stonehenge was at its earliest phase of construction.
This suggests that communities in the area were using this much simpler wooden construction to celebrate celestial events 500 years before Stonehenge’s massive stones were fully erected and carefully aligned with the movements of the sun.
“Those kinds of monuments were built by early farmers, who had to grow crops and sustain their animals,” Wexler said. “And for that, they needed the sun to do its job.”
Because the sun played such a crucial role in people’s livelihoods, she said, “celebrations linked to the solstices likely carried deep symbolic meaning.”
The Bulford discovery comes just ahead of this year’s U.K. summer solstice on Sunday, when thousands of people are expected to gather at Stonehenge to celebrate the longest day of the year.
“What few will realize is that 5,000 years ago on a nearby hillside overlooking modern-day Bulford, people were doing the exact same thing,” said Harding, who is well known in the U.K. for his appearances on the “Time Team” TV show.
Like their ancient ancestors, visitors standing at the center of the stone circle on Sunday will be able to watch the sun rise above the Heel Stone to the northeast — weather depending, of course.
During the winter solstice, the setting sun aligns with the monument’s central stone in the opposite direction.
One of Britain’s most recognizable landmarks, Stonehenge is among the country’s most popular tourist attractions. UNESCO, which designated it a World Heritage Site in 1986, had called it “the most architecturally sophisticated prehistoric stone circle in the world.”
Exactly who built Stonehenge — and how they transported some of its stones, weighing up to 40 tons, across vast distances — remains a mystery.
Its purpose is also debated. Some believe the monument was linked to death and burial rituals, while others argue it may have served as a place where communities gathered to mark important moments in the seasonal calendar.
“The regenerative power of the sun could have been connected with ideas about the afterlife,” Wexler said. “But social cohesion and bringing people together could also have been one of the purposes for such monuments.”
“People gather from all over the place to have massive feasts and celebrate these key moments in the seasonal calendar at a really grand scale,” she said.
“Perhaps people were doing it in Bulford, long before they put up the big stones of Stonehenge.”
Add NBC News to Google
Elmira AliievaElmira Aliieva is an NBC News intern based in London.
The Associated Press contributed.Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'
Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
