Darryn Peterson selected by the Utah Jazz with the No. 2 pick in the 2026 NBA Draft
2026 NBA
Draft
LIVE
Updates1m ago
Live Picks TrackerBest Available PlayersAJ Dybantsa To WizardsGradesTop 75 Prospects AnalysisDarryn Peterson selected by the Utah Jazz with the No. 2 pick in the 2026 NBA Draft
Guard Darryn Peterson will join a young core in Salt Lake City. William Purnell / Imagn Images
By Sam Vecenie, John Hollinger and David AldridgeJune 23, 2026 Updated 8:26 pm EDTThe Athletic has live coverage of the 2026 NBA Draft.
The Utah Jazz selected Darryn Peterson with the No. 2 pick Tuesday in the NBA Draft.
Peterson spent one season at Kansas, playing in 24 games and averaging 20.2 points, 4.2 rebounds and 1.6 assists per game. In high school, he showed he was a strong ballhandler who counters defenders well with his herky-jerky actions. He can not only keep his dribble alive, but also threaten defenses with his creativity out of ball screens.
At the NBA combine, he measured at 6 feet 4.5 without shoes, with a wingspan of 6 feet 9 3/4 inches and an 8-foot-7 standing reach. He plays with strength and physicality and has a powerful, skinny frame that looks like it will continue to fill out in the next three years.
Sam Vecenie’s draft guide summary
Why Darryn Peterson's best basketball is still ahead of himSam VeceniePeterson was as complete a guard as I’ve evaluated entering college basketball in a long while. He’s an aggressive shot hunter on the court, and I love the way he went about improving his passing ability out of ball screens. Until this season at Kansas, he had never stagnated, continually working his way up a steady trajectory to the top of his recruiting class.
But then he plateaued with the Jayhawks, and there is a case that he took a step back in some respects — especially as a passer and playmaker. How much of it was because of injury? How much of it was because of the situation around him at Kansas? How much of it was because college basketball was harder than high school? Peterson’s performance raised questions, especially in regard to his decision-making and ability to consistently get paint touches. However, it’s possible these issues will go away once he gets into an NBA offensive scheme.
I’m buying into what I saw from Peterson in high school. It’s exceptionally hard to find players who are this creative, who can make shots at this level at such a young age and who have at least demonstrated the ability to pass and defend at some point, even if those skills have been inconsistent. Yes, there are questions that Peterson needs to answer for NBA teams. But the talent is the talent, and Peterson projects to be the kind of player who can dribble, pass, shoot, defend and think the game at a high level, as long as his development goes well over the next two years.
An elite shooter with All-NBA scoring guard upside, despite his strange Kansas year.
John Hollinger’s analysis
Peterson came into the year as the No. 1 player on most draft boards, but his injury-riddled season at Kansas left a lot of questions. In particular, the minutes he played didn’t really showcase him as a lead creator despite a high scoring rate. His stat line is more of an elite 3-and-D guy, which obviously still has value, but that would be a slightly disappointing outcome this high in the draft.
The most notable stat for Peterson is 9.9 field goal attempts for every assist in Big 12 play, which isn’t quite in Cam Thomas territory but definitely isn’t good for a guard prospect. You can only blame him playing off-ball for some of that; most of the other elite wing prospects from recent years averaged between 4 and 7 shots per assist. Even Dybantsa, who wasn’t exactly nicknamed the Human Assist, was at 5 shots per assist.
Peterson’s injuries and limited minutes somewhat obscured how much he was scoring, though; in conference games, he averaged 40.2 points per 100 possessions, more than Dybantsa. That’s partly because when he went to the rim in the half court, he was shooting every time; in transition, oddly, he threw some tremendous alley-oops. Peterson, alas, wasn’t quite as efficient as he could have been on those shots; he lacked explosion at the rim, and his left hand frequently let him down as a finisher.
David Aldridge’s draft confidential
Eastern Conference scout No. 1: Darryn has the higher floor (over Dybantsa). He’s going to be really good. Can he be a core player, a Steph (Curry) or Klay (Thompson)? I think he has the ability to be Klay-level. He’s really, really good. I went to a few practices, and he’s as good as any college player I’ve seen. It wasn’t like it was a bunch of first-round picks around him, like if he was at Duke. … His high school team was the same way — it wasn’t great.
Teams try to take him out. I saw him shoot with his left hand on four straight possessions: a jumper, a layup off the glass. … There’s a lot of poise to him. I don’t like anybody doing the Kobe Bryant, “I’ve got Mamba Mentality.” I don’t really like that. He’s a quiet kid. He’s not going to seek attention. I think he’s closer to Kawhi (Leonard) than Kobe in terms of personality.
College assistant coach No. 1 (his team played Kansas): I love his demeanor. He seemed locked in. (But) when we jumped on them, I felt like he had a little bit of “I don’t want any of this.” There wasn’t a lot of fight from him, which I was a little surprised with. When we played BYU, the skill (from Dybantsa) was there, but I was like, “This guy’s competitive.” I didn’t get that from Peterson.
The size, the shooting was there. That’s a given. I think he handles it fine. He keeps it simple when he needs to. I saw him a lot in high school and AAU, and he’s got a good enough handle. He’s got good size for that position. I just think, naturally, he wants to shoot the ball. But his passing and assists were fine. Defense was OK. Dybantsa, I was like, this dude isn’t the best defender, but he cares.
This story will be updated.
Jun 24, 2026Connections: Sports Edition
Spot the pattern. Connect the terms
Find the hidden link between sports terms
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'
Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
