Christophe Lollichon on his problem with Courtois, signing Kepa and Mendy, and his hope for Penders

Christophe Lollichon was a key member of the backroom staff at Chelsea during the Roman Abramovich era AMA/Corbis via Getty Images
ExclusiveChristophe Lollichon on his problem with Courtois, signing Kepa and Mendy, and his hope for Penders
By Liam TwomeyJune 25, 2026 Updated 2:34 am EDTIn the first part of an exclusive two-part interview, former Chelsea goalkeeping coach Christophe Lollichon discussed his working relationship with Petr Cech at both Rennes and Stamford Bridge, and the preparation that went into the Czech’s unforgettable heroics on the run to Champions League glory with the west London club in 2012.
This is part two, where he reflects on Cech moving across the capital to rivals Arsenal and his own role in the Chelsea careers of Thibaut Courtois, Kepa Arrizabalaga and Edouard Mendy, and gives his thoughts on Mike Penders — the club’s big hope for the future.
What You Should Read Next
Christophe Lollichon on Chelsea, Cech and how to thwart Messi: ‘Wait, wait, force him to make a choice’
The former Chelsea coach discusses his working relationship with Cech, and the preparation that went into the keeper's heroics in Munich
The Champions League triumph in Munich was the peak of the Cech-Lollichon working partnership, but the landscape was already shifting.
The previous year, Lollichon had received a call from a contact in Belgium about a teenage goalkeeper who was already starting for Genk. “One week later I was in Genk and saw this guy, and I said, ‘Wow, he has something special’,” he recalls. “So I said to (Chelsea technical director) Michael Emenalo and Roman (Abramovich, the owner): ‘We have maybe the next Cech in Belgium’.”
Chelsea duly signed Thibaut Courtois in July 2011 before sending him to Spain for the first of what became three consecutive season-long loans at Atletico Madrid. Lollichon became very familiar with the flights between London and the Spanish capital as he played an active role in the youngster’s development.
Successions are rarely painless. Lollichon says Jose Mourinho — with whom he admits he had a “very difficult relationship” — decided to recall Courtois from loan after Cech conceded a goal to Javier Pastore in a Champions League quarter-final first leg against Paris Saint-Germain at Parc des Princes in April 2014, and believes the Chelsea manager should have handled it better.
“He never spoke with Petr the following season to tell him, ‘OK, Petr, I will start the season with Thibaut because he’s the future and I need to prepare the future’,” Lollichon says of Mourinho. “He never spoke with him. Petr is not stupid, I’m not stupid. Thibaut started the first game against Burnley and played very well, because he was ready to play.
Christophe Lollichon, Petr Cech (centre) and Thibaut Courtois during Chelsea’s pre-season in 2014 (Darren Walsh/Chelsea FC via Getty Images)“Thibaut respected Petr a lot. We spent a fantastic season (together). It was very difficult to see Petr on the bench behind me, but we had two of the three best goalkeepers in the world. Petr was fantastic professionally, never changed his attitude and he helped Thibaut.”
In recognition of his stellar service, Cech was allowed to leave Chelsea, signing for London rivals Arsenal in the summer of 2015. Lollichon says Abramovich blocked him from joining Cech in making the move across London. “I was ready to go to Arsenal, but I respected the boss’ decision,” he says.
As well as his long-standing relationship with Cech, Lollichon was keenly aware of the mounting issues between himself and Courtois.
“We didn’t share the same view on work and the concept of effort,” he says. “Thibaut is one of the best talents I saw in my life. But however talented you may be, to make the most of your potential and realise it, you must put in a great deal of effort every day.
“As far as I’m concerned, Thibaut could have been at the very top of his game for 10 or 15 years. Of course, he’s one of the best, but he plays too comfortably. I reckon he could be more dominant. He really does have all the qualities needed for that.
“Back when we were working together, and especially after Petr left, there were certain training approaches he didn’t want to pursue. It was difficult, the tension grew and, in the end, it was impossible to continue to work together.”
Courtois and Lollichon did not always see eye to eye at Chelsea (Catherine Ivill – AMA/Getty Images)Lollichon moved away from first-team coaching duties in 2016 to focus on Chelsea’s goalkeeper recruitment and loans department. It was in this role that he contributed to the search for Courtois’ replacement when the Belgian forced a move to Real Madrid two years later.
“I gave (then Chelsea manager) Maurizio Sarri my selection of goalkeepers (to replace Courtois),” he says. “The first name in the document was Petr to come back — not because he’s my friend, at this time we didn’t have leaders in the dressing room. Petr is a f***ing legend at Chelsea and I asked him, ‘Petr, how is your body?’. He had a check-up with a specialist and the specialist said, ‘OK, you have two good years in front of you’. So Petr was the first.
“Kepa was on that list, but not at the top. I had a meeting with Sarri and when I said Petr, he said no. Good start.
“During the conversation, he said, ‘Do you know Kepa?’. I said, ‘Maurizio, he’s on my list but not among my favourites’. He said, ‘I played against him, he made a fantastic game’. I saw the game. He made a few spectacular saves. I said, ‘Maurizio, this guy is not adapted to your model of play’, but he just remembered the saves he made against him.”
Chelsea ended up paying €80million (£71.6m; $91m) to buy Arrizabalaga out of his contract at Bilbao’s Athletic Club, making him the world’s most expensive goalkeeper and handing him a seven-year contract. “Eighty million!” Lollichon exclaims. “I told the club, with all due respect to Kepa, that this cost did not reflect my understanding of the market. I was told that Sarri was insisting (on him).”
Kepa Arrizabalaga struggled at Chelsea (Daniel Leal/AFP via Getty Images)Arrizabalaga’s struggles left Sarri replacement Frank Lampard looking for a more reliable goalkeeper in the summer of 2020, and Lollichon had an obscure name in mind.
“I had started to observe Mendy two years before,” he says. “He played in the second division in France, in Reims. Petr was at Arsenal and I sent him a message saying, ‘Petr, look at the goalkeeper in Reims. I think he’s a good guy’. Petr observed a little bit. He (Cech) was still a player but we had a lot of conversations and I continued on my side.”
Lollichon says he recommended that his former club Rennes sign Mendy from Reims in August 2019. The following summer, he and Cech — by this time back at Chelsea as technical and performance advisor — pitched the Senegal international as the solution to the Arrizabalaga problem.
“Frank was a little bit surprised, the directors of the club too,” Lollichon says. “In the end, they said, ‘OK, you can start the process’.
“The first answer from Rennes was €55million. Petr spoke with the agent and I spoke with Edouard. He was very happy, but Rennes were not. The discussions were very long and we were at the limit to stop (pursuing the signing). Petr was very strong and we made a few suggestions to help move the matter forward more quickly.”
The deal was ultimately done for around £22million and Mendy — currently at the World Cup with Senegal — proved reliable enough to be the starting goalkeeper for Chelsea’s second Champions League-winning side in 2021.
Edouard Mendy lifts the European Cup in 2021 (Michael Steele/Getty Images)Lollichon is no longer professionally invested in Chelsea’s success, but he has not lost his passion for goalkeeping or his eye for talent.
One who has caught his eye is Mike Penders, the 20-year-old who will compete for the No 1 spot at Stamford Bridge next season after a productive loan spell at BlueCo sister club Strasbourg.
“He has very good potential,” Lollichon says. “He’s another guy from the Belgium school, like Courtois, like Koen Casteels (a former international now at Saudi Pro League club Al Qadsiah). I spoke with Penders when Dunkirk played Strasbourg in the French Cup. I liked the conversation we had.
“He’s very clever. I saw a mature goalkeeper. He has to improve with his feet, but at 20 years old, he’s very good. He has good positioning, he’s proactive and he wants to learn.
Mike Penders will compete to be first-choice at Chelsea next season (Sebastien Bozon/AFP via Getty Images)“I felt this attitude in our conversation. He asked me about the Premier League. We spoke for just 20 minutes but it was very interesting. This guy could be the next good one in Chelsea, because for a long time now the goalkeeper position is poor in Chelsea.”
Coming from the man whose career intersected with every good goalkeeper Chelsea have had this century, those words carry real weight.
Jun 25, 2026Connections: Sports Edition
Spot the pattern. Connect the terms
Find the hidden link between sports terms
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'