Children under two should have NO screen time at all, study says

Babies and toddlers under the age of two should not receive any intentional screen time at all, according to a new study.
Researchers have warned that using screens at this age has been linked with long-term negative effects on health and quality of life.
This includes limited language development, difficulty sleeping, eye health issues and an increased risk of obesity.
The study, described as the most comprehensive review so far of all available global findings on the subject, called on the government to reconsider its recently published guidance on screen time for under-fives.
New recommendations state that children under two should avoid screen time, ‘other than for shared activities that encourage bonding, interaction and conversation’.
But the study goes one step further, warning that any kind of screen time can be linked to a wide range of potential problems.
‘We have learned that screen use among the under-twos is a global concern that in 2026 is not being adequately addressed,’ Rafe Clayton, from the University of Leeds, said.
‘This has implications for a whole generation and their future quality of life.’
Previous studies have found that two-year-olds who spend longer on screens have a lower vocabulary
Existing guidance from the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Paediatrics, which recommends that under-twos avoid screen time, is already being exceeded globally during the critical first 1001 days of life, from pregnancy to age two, according to the report.
Other harms associated with this include reduced opportunities to bond with parents, reduced play with peers, an increased risk of overstimulation and a reliance on devices for emotional regulation.
The researchers stress the findings reflect the pressures of modern digital environments rather than individual parenting choices.
Dame Andrea Leadsom, Founder of 1001 Critical Days Foundation, said: ‘This landmark review is a wake-up call.
‘The evidence increasingly suggests that screens offer limited benefits for babies and may carry significant risks during the first 1001 days, the most important period of human development.
‘Parents must not be blamed for a problem they did not create.
‘Screens are now part of everyday life and many families are navigating this challenge without the information and support they need.
‘The responsibility cannot rest solely on their shoulders.’
A separate study found that 2 per cent of nine-month-old babies had more than three hours of screen time every day
Researchers have warned that using screens at this age has been linked with long-term negative effects on health and quality of life
How to keep your children off screens
- Taking children outdoors to spend time in nature prevents screen time and can benefit physical development and eye health
- Avoiding using screens at mealtimes could correlate with healthier eating habits
- Access to non-digital toys is beneficial for reducing screen time and improving development
- Spending time in the physical presence of others – meeting, interacting and playing with other people – supports social development
Dame Andrea also called on technology companies to play their part, adding: ‘Parents should not be presented with content that is labelled or promoted as suitable for babies when the evidence points to the contrary.’
More research is needed into which strategies are most effective for parents and caregivers wanting to reduce and cut out babies’ screen time.
But the review mentions several that have been proven to help.
Taking children outdoors to spend time in nature prevents screen time and can benefit physical development and eye health, the experts said.
They suggest avoiding using screens at mealtimes to boost healthier eating habits and giving children access to non-digital toys.
Spending time in the physical presence of others – meeting, interacting and playing with other people – also supports social development, they added.
The review also found that parent and caregiver screen time correlates with babies’ screen time, but the researchers emphasise that parents should not be the focus of blame or criticism here.
Digital screens are embedded in our lives – from working, to buying groceries, accessing healthcare and communicating with friends and family – so passive screen exposure is inevitable, they said.
Read More
Revealed: The shockingly high amount of time the average Brit spends scrolling on their phone every day - so, how does your screentime stack up?

A recent poll revealed almost one million school children spend most lessons learning from screens despite evidence that too much exposure may be harmful.
New research suggests nine per cent of all pupils in the UK – around 960,000 – spend nearly every lesson on a 'one-to-one screen', such as an iPad or other tablet.
Among primary school children only, the proportion is six per cent – around 270,000.
Popular apps in schools include Minecraft Education, which is based on the famous computer game, and language tool Duolingo.
A further quarter of the entire pupil population – or 2.6 million – are using screens on a daily basis.
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'

Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'