katero
Jun 30, 2026

Cardinals' Kyler Murray Decision Looks Worse in Hindsight — But It Was Still Right

Cardinals' Kyler Murray Decision Looks Worse in Hindsight — But It Was Still Right

Hindsight will always be 20/20 when it comes to Kyler Murray.Donnie Druin|
Sep 25, 2025; Glendale, Arizona, USA; Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray (1) warms up before the game against the Seattle Seahawks at State Farm Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images
Sep 25, 2025; Glendale, Arizona, USA; Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray (1) warms up before the game against the Seattle Seahawks at State Farm Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

In this story:

Arizona Cardinals

The Arizona Cardinals and Kyler Murray pairing lasted seven years, affording fans highs and lows from the former No. 1 overall pick through his stint in the desert.

Murray's elite athleticism, arm talent and off-script playmaking made him next in line of young franchise quarterbacks — and for a few seasons, that's exactly what fans at State Farm Stadium experienced. Rookie of the year honors and a 2021 run to the postseason quickly followed with multiple Pro Bowls.

Yet things crumbled, with Murray's ACL injury late in 2022 serving as a turning point in his career. As fate would have it, the Cardinals would fire multiple coaches with Murray on the roster, and entering 2026, it was time to start fresh.

That rang true for both parties, though it's easy to second-guess the decision after the dust settles.

ESPN Thinks Cardinals Fumbled Kyler Murray

Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murra
Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray watches his team from the sidelines as they play the San Francisco 49ers at State Farm Stadium in Glendale on Nov. 16, 2025. | Joe Rondone/The Republic / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Grading each team's offseason, ESPN's Seth Walder awarded the Cardinals a prestigious "D" grade and laid into the organization's handling of Murray:

"Murray was due more than $78 million over the next two years, which would have been guaranteed had he remained on the roster on March 15. That was more than any team would have wanted to take on for him. But what if Arizona had paid his $17 million roster bonus and then traded him? The Cardinals could have even converted some of his salary into a signing bonus. They could have received draft pick compensation for Murray while paying him, say, $20 million this year to not play for them. Or even $30 million!

"Instead, the Cardinals released the quarterback, will pay him $35.5 million to not play for them and didn't receive any compensation. Perhaps no team wanted to bite on option A. But if that's the case, was it worth cutting Murray ? If the $35.5 million was sunk cost, all the Cardinals would be signing up for by keeping him was a league minimum salary in 2026 and $19.5 million fully guaranteed in 2027 (he'd have been owed another $17 million or so if they wanted to keep him for 2027). Surely Murray was worth that."

Walder does make some valid points, but hindsight is very much 20/20 when it comes to Murray.

Why Cardinals Made Tough (But Right) Kyler Murray Decision

Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murra
September 21, 2025; Santa Clara, California, USA; Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray (1) during the first quarter against the San Francisco 49ers at Levi's Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Terada-Imagn Images | Kyle Terada-Imagn Images

Murray's contract was nearly impossible for the Cardinals to trade, and even if Arizona swallowed that roster bonus, the value on Murray was nowhere near practical enough to offload him.

In an ideal world, Arizona would have gotten something for Murray rather than the eventual avenue they took in flat-out releasing him. Yet if the Cardinals were going to jump through the hoops to pay his 2027 roster bonus and convert a signing bonus like Walder suggested, they weren't far off from releasing him like they ultimately did.

Other posts