Alex Murdaugh's lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a 'spectacle'
True Crime Alex Murdaugh's lawyers withdraw request for civilian clothes, accuse prosecutors of creating a 'spectacle'
Defense team says it will instead focus on pretrial issues including unknown DNA from the crime scene and a venue change
By
Sarah Rumpf-Whitten Fox News
Published
June 25, 2026 5:06pm EDT close 
Video Alex Murdaugh attorney predicts jury will find him not guilty at retrial
Murdaugh attorney Dick Harpootlian says the state's case remains circumstantial and argues prosecutors failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in the high-profile murder case.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!Alex Murdaugh’s lawyers say prosecutors are trying to turn his next courtroom appearance into a spectacle.
The convicted former Lowcountry lawyer had asked to appear unshackled and in civilian clothes at trial and in televised pretrial hearings as he awaits a new murder trial in the killings of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul.
But after prosecutors accused him of seeking special treatment, Murdaugh’s defense team withdrew the request, saying they would not waste court time arguing over "the optics" of a status conference.
"If the State wants to use that for a public spectacle, so be it," the defense wrote. "Mr. Murdaugh will not waste the Court’s time at the upcoming status conference arguing about the optics."
"Mr. Murdaugh will not waste the Court’s time at the upcoming status conference arguing about the optics."
Alex Murdaugh is found guilty on all counts of the murder of his wife and son at the Colleton County Courthouse in Walterboro, S.C., on March 2, 2023. (Joshua Boucher/Pool)
South Carolina prosecutors had urged a Colleton County judge to deny the motion, arguing that Murdaugh’s fame does not entitle him to be treated differently from other inmates.
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X
Murdaugh remains in state custody on financial-crime convictions and is serving a 27-year sentence, prosecutors said. He is also serving a concurrent 40-year federal sentence tied to similar crimes.
His murder convictions were reversed in May by the South Carolina Supreme Court, which ordered new proceedings after finding improper interference by the former Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca "Becky" Hill.
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
But the state said the reversal does not change Murdaugh’s status as an inmate or the security concerns surrounding him.
"SCDC’s practice and position here is that any inmate should remain in restraints and in uniform for court appearances," prosecutors wrote, adding that Murdaugh’s long sentence, the seriousness of the murder charges and his notoriety all heighten security concerns.
Alex Murdaugh, convicted of killing his wife and son in June 2021, greets his defense attorney Jim Griffin before a retrial hearing at the Richland County Judicial Center in Columbia, S.C., on Jan. 16, 2024. (Gavin McIntyre/The Post and Courier via AP)
The state also pointed to past custody issues, alleging that during the original trial, a family member passed Murdaugh a book through a defense staffer without law enforcement’s knowledge.
LISTEN TO THE NEW 'CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO' PODCAST
Prosecutors said the book was later found in his cell and led to a jail contraband warrant. They also cited two prison disciplinary actions from August 2023, including abuse of privileges and unauthorized use of another inmate’s PIN.
WHAT TYLER ROBINSON'S DEFENSE WANTS HIDDEN AND WHY PROSECUTORS AND MEDIA SAY NO IN COURT
"This case is ultimately about the fact that Defendant thinks he is special. He is not," prosecutors wrote.
LIKE WHAT YOU'RE READING? FIND MORE ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
Alex Murdaugh touches the back of his head during a jury-tampering hearing at the Richland County Judicial Center in Columbia, S.C., on Jan. 29, 2024. (Andrew J. Whitaker/The Post And Courier)
Murdaugh’s lawyers fired back, accusing prosecutors of "histrionics" and arguing that the state had failed to show any special need to display him in shackles before potential jurors.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
They said Murdaugh has never threatened or attempted escape or violence while in custody and has appeared at numerous hearings and through a six-week trial without disruptive behavior.
The defense also argued that courts recognize the danger of showing defendants in restraints, even outside a jury’s physical presence, when cameras could broadcast the image to future jurors.
To make the point, Murdaugh’s lawyers cited the case against Tyler Robinson, the alleged assassin of Charlie Kirk, saying the judge there ordered cameras repositioned after reports Robinson had been shown in shackles and warned they could be excluded if it happened again.
South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson looks over to Alex Murdaugh as prosecutor Creighton Waters makes closing arguments at the Colleton County Courthouse on March 1, 2023. (Joshua Boucher/The State/Pool)
The defense accused prosecutors of relying on rhetoric rather than law, writing that the case is not about whether Murdaugh "thinks" he is special, but whether the state can prove the murder charges against him.
Still, Murdaugh’s lawyers withdrew the motion, saying they did not want to distract from more substantive issues ahead of retrial, including motions involving unknown DNA from the crime scene, access to case materials and a possible venue change.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the prosecutor's office as well as Murdaugh's defense team.
Sarah Rumpf-Whitten is a U.S. Writer at Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to [email protected] and on X @s_rumpfwhitten
Badenoch blasts 'moaning' female Labour MPs over Burnham jobs 'quota'
Kemi Badenoch has told Labour women to earn a job in Andy Burnham's Cabinet instead of demanding they are handed jobs because of their gender.
The Tory leader lashed out today amid reports that female MPs are demanding the de-facto new prime minister introduce a 50:50 gender split 'quota' in his government.
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister also complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts.
But in a scathing article in the Times today Mrs Badenoch told them to 'stop moaning' and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'.
'There are many, many reasons why you shouldn't have any Milibands in the cabinet,' she said.
'But complaining that the boys haven't given them the right jobs or that the boys are taking all the jobs, just shows that Labour's women still don't get it.'
The idea of quotas was also attacked by Baroness Jacqui Smith, Labour's Skills Minister.
Asked by Times Radio if Mr Burnham should reserve jobs for women, she said: 'No, I think what Andy Burnham should be doing is building the very best team around him to change this country.'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs
Amid reports that former foreign secretary David Miliband (above, right, in 2010) is being lined up to return to the role, possibly with his brother Ed as Chancellor, one female minister complained that Burnham could not have 'more Milibands than women' in the top posts
But Mrs Badenoch told them to pipe down and get chosen on merit instead of retreating into 'more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country'
A letter written by the Women's Parliamentary Labour Party and seen by the BBC has called on Mr Burnham to ensure a 50:50 split between men and women in government jobs after he succeeds Sir Keir Starmer.
'We are asking you to demonstrate this change from day one and address the toxicity and misogyny within our own party and government,' it said.
Labour has never had a female leader, while the Conservatives have had three, and Mrs Badenoch urged the government to follow its meritocratic example.
'If you run a meritocracy, then you do not have to worry about jobs for the boys,' she wrote.
'Every woman who is a Conservative MP, every woman who has ever won the leadership, has had to fight to get where she is.
'By contrast, Labour women are demanding guarantees from Burnham. But the truth is he doesn't have to give any guarantees.
'If none of Labour's women are prepared to get their hands dirty and challenge him for the leadership, their demands are toothless.'
'In fact, it's quite revealing that the women's parliamentary Labour Party has written to Burnham asking him to commit himself to at least 50 per cent female ministers.
'This has nothing to do with meritocracy. It is yet more of the failed identity politics that is holding back our country.'
